Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CONFIG_INET

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CONFIG_INET_ECN\s+creates\s+problems\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

21. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1): Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 14:31:15 +1100; Actually, I didn't propose ignoring RST packets; I didn't realize that Floyd suggested this. That would be completely unacceptable. `Doesn't work through masquerading sites' is misleading. In normal; /archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00178.html (10,349 bytes)
22. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 23:25:49 -0500 (EST); That was around 2.0.25 days, IIRC. The current implementation/RFC catches this. If we are going to help avoid ECN turning into a fiasco like NAT (your favorite ;->) then we need to hammer now. If we; /archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00179.html (11,438 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 22
Page: [1] [2]