Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CONFIG_INET_ECN\s+creates\s+problems\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 01:02:02 -0500
CONFIG_INET_ECN prevents me from accessing www.tdwaterhouse.com and the connect calls don't work - traceroutes expire at some point before the destination is reached. NAT routing is not affected.
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00016.html (7,743 bytes)

2. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:18:57 +0000 (GMT)
I found similar results, though in my case, with ECN turned on, a large number of sites were just sending RSTs straight back when I tried to connect. Turn off ECN and everything works fine. Maybe the
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00017.html (9,008 bytes)

3. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 19:35:52 -0500
Peter> I found similar results, though in my case, with ECN turned on, a Peter> large number of sites were just sending RSTs straight back when I Peter> tried to connect. Turn off ECN and everything
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00018.html (9,097 bytes)

4. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 20:33:33 -0500 (EST)
Sorry for the lengthy reply. Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx> did extensive tests with Linux on the net to try and isolate which sites were anti-ECN. Those tests were repeated by J Padhye<jitu@xxxxxxxx>
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00019.html (11,679 bytes)

5. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:40:34 +0100
You mean the "try once, and if anything goes wrong for whatever reason, assume it's ECN's fault" approach ? - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Wer
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00022.html (8,812 bytes)

6. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 07:56:39 -0500 (EST)
Yeah. Full text at: http://www.aciri.org/floyd/papers/ECN.Oct2000.txt cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00025.html (8,396 bytes)

7. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:38:02 +0300 (MSK)
I am thrilled. And I have to say honestly: when some daring hero will prepare patch implementing this new bug, it is pretty useless to submit it to me. When I am thrilled in such extent, I used to l
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00027.html (8,302 bytes)

8. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 13:03:16 +1100
I know Andi claimed that netfilter's (EXPERIMENTAL) `unclean' match used to dislike this, but I couldn't see (and checking again, still can't see) anywhere in the code where that was ever the case. I
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00040.html (9,889 bytes)

9. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:08:19 -0800
Penalizes first SYN failures (quite common from .au) and doesn't solve the Cisco-sends-RST problem. Yes it does, and this is one of the biggest problems I have with the floyd draft. Any proposed RFC
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00043.html (9,435 bytes)

10. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 14:31:15 +1100
Actually, I didn't propose ignoring RST packets; I didn't realize that Floyd suggested this. That would be completely unacceptable. `Doesn't work through masquerading sites' is misleading. In normal
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00044.html (10,321 bytes)

11. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 23:25:49 -0500 (EST)
That was around 2.0.25 days, IIRC. The current implementation/RFC catches this. If we are going to help avoid ECN turning into a fiasco like NAT (your favorite ;->) then we need to hammer now. If we
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00045.html (11,407 bytes)

12. CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: Tom Zerucha <tz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 01:02:02 -0500
CONFIG_INET_ECN prevents me from accessing www.tdwaterhouse.com and myccinfo.com the connect calls don't work - traceroutes expire at some point before the destination is reached. NAT routing is not
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00150.html (7,743 bytes)

13. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: Peter Denison <peterd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:18:57 +0000 (GMT)
I found similar results, though in my case, with ECN turned on, a large number of sites were just sending RSTs straight back when I tried to connect. Turn off ECN and everything works fine. Maybe the
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00151.html (9,050 bytes)

14. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 19:35:52 -0500
Peter> I found similar results, though in my case, with ECN turned on, a Peter> large number of sites were just sending RSTs straight back when I Peter> tried to connect. Turn off ECN and everything
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00152.html (9,204 bytes)

15. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 20:33:33 -0500 (EST)
Sorry for the lengthy reply. Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx> did extensive tests with Linux on the net to try and isolate which sites were anti-ECN. Those tests were repeated by J Padhye<jitu@xxxxxxxx>
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00153.html (11,752 bytes)

16. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: Werner Almesberger <Werner.Almesberger@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:40:34 +0100
You mean the "try once, and if anything goes wrong for whatever reason, assume it's ECN's fault" approach ? - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Wer
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00156.html (8,975 bytes)

17. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 07:56:39 -0500 (EST)
Yeah. Full text at: http://www.aciri.org/floyd/papers/ECN.Oct2000.txt cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00159.html (8,439 bytes)

18. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:38:02 +0300 (MSK)
Hello! I am thrilled. And I have to say honestly: when some daring hero will prepare patch implementing this new bug, it is pretty useless to submit it to me. When I am thrilled in such extent, I use
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00161.html (8,349 bytes)

19. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 13:03:16 +1100
I know Andi claimed that netfilter's (EXPERIMENTAL) `unclean' match used to dislike this, but I couldn't see (and checking again, still can't see) anywhere in the code where that was ever the case. I
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00174.html (9,935 bytes)

20. Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:08:19 -0800
Penalizes first SYN failures (quite common from .au) and doesn't solve the Cisco-sends-RST problem. Yes it does, and this is one of the biggest problems I have with the floyd draft. Any proposed RFC
/archives/netdev/2000-11/msg00177.html (9,499 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu