Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Blocksize\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Blocksize\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:34:33 -0400; I know that the blocksize is currently fixed at the pagesize of 4K. Are there plans in the works to allow different blocksizes? Specifically smaller, like 512B? -Chip; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00965.html (6,806 bytes)
2. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:39:16 -0500; There are plans, I keep starting work on it and getting other work to do, the code to do this is somewhat involved, localized, but involved. It will happen, but right now there is stuff I need to do; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00967.html (7,565 bytes)
3. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:42:59 +0200; At 10:34 20-7-2001 -0400, Christian, Chip wrote: I know that the blocksize is currently fixed at the pagesize of 4K. Are there plans in the works to allow different blocksizes? Specifically smaller,; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00968.html (7,512 bytes)
4. RE: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:06:19 -0500; I have a question if we could possibly even go up to bs as large as 32k? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00977.html (7,378 bytes)
5. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:11:38 -0500; Currently I only have plans to implement filesystem block size less than page cache size. The 2.5 kernel may bring along a page cache size larger than the page size. The combination of the two is ho; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00978.html (8,464 bytes)
6. Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:34:33 -0400; I know that the blocksize is currently fixed at the pagesize of 4K. Are there plans in the works to allow different blocksizes? Specifically smaller, like 512B? -Chip; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02256.html (6,806 bytes)
7. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:39:16 -0500; There are plans, I keep starting work on it and getting other work to do, the code to do this is somewhat involved, localized, but involved. It will happen, but right now there is stuff I need to do; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02258.html (7,565 bytes)
8. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:42:59 +0200; At 10:34 20-7-2001 -0400, Christian, Chip wrote: I know that the blocksize is currently fixed at the pagesize of 4K. Are there plans in the works to allow different blocksizes? Specifically smaller,; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02259.html (7,512 bytes)
9. RE: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:06:19 -0500; I have a question if we could possibly even go up to bs as large as 32k? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02268.html (7,378 bytes)
10. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:11:38 -0500; Currently I only have plans to implement filesystem block size less than page cache size. The 2.5 kernel may bring along a page cache size larger than the page size. The combination of the two is ho; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02269.html (8,464 bytes)
11. Blocksize (score: 1): Author: "Christian, Chip" <chip.christian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:34:33 -0400; I know that the blocksize is currently fixed at the pagesize of 4K. Are there plans in the works to allow different blocksizes? Specifically smaller, like 512B? -Chip; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03547.html (6,806 bytes)
12. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:39:16 -0500; There are plans, I keep starting work on it and getting other work to do, the code to do this is somewhat involved, localized, but involved. It will happen, but right now there is stuff I need to do; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03549.html (7,690 bytes)
13. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:42:59 +0200; Yes, this is on the todo list. See the todo list on the site. (it's not called todo list but I forgot). Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for whic; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03550.html (7,551 bytes)
14. RE: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:06:19 -0500; I have a question if we could possibly even go up to bs as large as 32k? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03559.html (7,393 bytes)
15. Re: Blocksize (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:11:38 -0500; Currently I only have plans to implement filesystem block size less than page cache size. The 2.5 kernel may bring along a page cache size larger than the page size. The combination of the two is ho; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03560.html (8,594 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]