Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BUG\:\s+soft\s+lockup\s+detected\s+on\s+CPU\#1\!\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:48:31 +0200
Hi Steven, no, it did not lock up yet but I did not do any "serious" webbrowsing with 2.6.18-rc2 so far. Best regards, Jochen
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00159.html (7,895 bytes)

2. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:58:05 +0200
Hi everyone. I have some more of these. Now they look like this every time I get them: Jul 19 18:43:15 [kernel] == Jul 19 18:43:15 [kernel] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] Jul 19 18:43:
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00263.html (11,673 bytes)

3. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:53:04 +0200
Hi, well, it locks up with 2.6.18-rc2 too. Three times today. And always during webbrowsing ... What's so special about it? Could it be because it accesses network and disk at the same time? The syst
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00264.html (9,067 bytes)

4. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:48:31 +0200
Hi Steven, no, it did not lock up yet but I did not do any "serious" webbrowsing with 2.6.18-rc2 so far. Best regards, Jochen
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00549.html (7,895 bytes)

5. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:58:05 +0200
Hi everyone. I have some more of these. Now they look like this every time I get them: Jul 19 18:43:15 [kernel] == Jul 19 18:43:15 [kernel] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] Jul 19 18:43:
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00653.html (11,673 bytes)

6. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:53:04 +0200
Hi, well, it locks up with 2.6.18-rc2 too. Three times today. And always during webbrowsing ... What's so special about it? Could it be because it accesses network and disk at the same time? The syst
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00654.html (9,067 bytes)

7. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:48:31 +0200
Hi Steven, no, it did not lock up yet but I did not do any "serious" webbrowsing with 2.6.18-rc2 so far. Best regards, Jochen
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00939.html (8,071 bytes)

8. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:58:05 +0200
Hi everyone. I have some more of these. Now they look like this every time I get them: Jul 19 18:43:15 [kernel] == Jul 19 18:43:15 [kernel] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] Jul 19 18:43:
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01043.html (11,849 bytes)

9. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:53:04 +0200
Hi, well, it locks up with 2.6.18-rc2 too. Three times today. And always during webbrowsing ... What's so special about it? Could it be because it accesses network and disk at the same time? The syst
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01044.html (9,244 bytes)

10. BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: <raksac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Hello, I am running the 2.6.28 based xfs kernel driver on a custom kernel with following kernel config enabled. CONFIG_PREEMPT CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP Running the following xfsqa causes a soft locku
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00226.html (8,758 bytes)

11. BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Rakesh <raksac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Hello, I am running the 2.6.28 based xfs kernel driver on a custom kernel with following kernel config enabled. CONFIG_PREEMPT CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP Running the following xfsqa causes a soft locku
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00228.html (8,748 bytes)

12. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:21:21 -0500 (EST)
Hello, I am running the 2.6.28 based xfs kernel driver on a custom kernel with following kernel config enabled. CONFIG_PREEMPT CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP Running the following xfsqa causes a soft lock
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00229.html (9,191 bytes)

13. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: <raksac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:33:35 -0800 (PST)
Hi Justin, Thank you for the pointer. Well as suggested I did and now the xfsqa goes upto test 011 but dies with a oops. Any suggestions? Here is the oops trace - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL po
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00246.html (13,566 bytes)

14. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: <raksac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:34:09 -0800 (PST)
With debug enabled it fails with this - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 printing eip: f8bd02c2 *pde = d658e067 Assertion failed: atomic_read(&ip->i_p
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00247.html (13,328 bytes)

15. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:36:08 -0500 (EST)
Hi Justin, Thank you for the pointer. Well as suggested I did and now the xfsqa goes upto test 011 but dies with a oops. Any suggestions? Here is the oops trace - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL p
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00248.html (8,400 bytes)

16. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: <raksac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Hi Justin, Yes it is a 2.6.18 rhel5 based custom kernel but the XFS driver is a back port from the 2.6.28.4 Thanks, Rakesh /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/i2c-0/0-002e/temp1_input
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00258.html (10,054 bytes)

17. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:49:16 +1100
Is the system making progress, or has it hung? i.e. does the test complete? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00267.html (9,179 bytes)

18. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:55:08 +1100
Then you get to keep all the broken bits to yourself. If you want to throw random versions of XFS at random versions of kernels then we can't help you - we don't have the time or resources to support
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00268.html (9,436 bytes)

19. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: <raksac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:55:33 -0800 (PST)
Hi Dave, No it does not. Just sits there any access to mount point (ll) also blocks forever. I must point out that I brought the changes from 2.6.28.4 xfs into my private space and that seems to show
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00269.html (10,188 bytes)

20. Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! (score: 1)
Author: <raksac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Well the problem is the older kernel XFS driver is buggy to such a large extent that there is data loss even for data on rest should a power loss occur. With a newer version back port I can preserve
/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00270.html (10,336 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu