Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Asynchronous\s+crypto\s+layer\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Asynchronous\s+crypto\s+layer\.\s*$/: 114 ]

Total 114 documents matching your query.

1. c possible cleanups (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 01:56:01 -0500 (EST); ossible cleanups: - make needlessly global code static - remove the following unused global functions: - datagram.c: skb_copy_datagram - iovec.c: memcpy_tokern; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00364.html (11,648 bytes)
2. onous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:23:55 -0500 (EST); this]. The real question was how would the sysadmin know which is the best load balancer to configure. Start simple, make one good load balancer, and ponly cr; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00365.html (8,246 bytes)
3. 90: network driver. (score: 1): Author: s Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:58:37 +0300; 2.2004 16:37:15: Here is why we submitted the original patch: We got reports from several customers that their dynamic routing daemons got hung when one networ; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00368.html (14,899 bytes)
4. onous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:07:18 +0300; ritten some day... If it has only SW crypto it does not need scheduler at all - only very simple switch, but if system has diferent kinds of HW crypto cards, a; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00369.html (9,891 bytes)
5. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: rzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:24:15 +0300; Here we go. Actually nothing excitement: since ecryption/decryption was made in a one thread (please see dirty hack in sync_provider.c:89 to allow crypto_cipher_{en,de}crypt() work in _bh context, BU; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00067.html (10,593 bytes)
6. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: ol@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:12:35 +0300; This patch implements several features discussed previously: - crypto_session_alloc() split. I did not change crypto_session_alloc() name, but added struct crypto_session *crypto_session_create( stru; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00068.html (8,952 bytes)
7. Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: erbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:22:38 +0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01297.html (19,838 bytes)
8. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: san <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 29 Oct 2004 08:42:18 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01333.html (9,649 bytes)
9. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: stoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:06:52 +0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01341.html (10,614 bytes)
10. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:03:06 +0200; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01342.html (10,703 bytes)
11. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:36:06 +0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01348.html (12,507 bytes)
12. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: hnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:53:30 +0200 (CEST); /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01353.html (11,159 bytes)
13. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: ickey" <dan.dickey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 29 Oct 2004 11:08:03 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01355.html (10,860 bytes)
14. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:27:41 +0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01356.html (12,666 bytes)
15. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author:; Date: 29 Oct 2004 11:11:14 -0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01357.html (10,899 bytes)
16. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:37:20 +0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01358.html (12,104 bytes)
17. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:28:34 +0200; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01360.html (11,988 bytes)
18. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: <mludvig@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:16:35 -0400 (EDT); /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01364.html (9,937 bytes)
19. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: Lindner <mlindner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:45:51 +0400; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01367.html (11,339 bytes)
20. Re: Asynchronous crypto layer. (score: 1): Author: arzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:44:24 -0400 (EDT); /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01373.html (9,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]