Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Assertions\s+when\s+lowering\s+tcp_tso_win_divisor\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: r Almesberger <wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:47:14 -0800 (PST)
t
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00608.html (8,367 bytes)

2. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: Mirko Lindner <mlindner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:47:55 -0800
e
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00609.html (9,619 bytes)

3. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: tephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:39:42 +1100
h
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00610.html (9,701 bytes)

4. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: idhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:59:18 +1100
t
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00611.html (9,318 bytes)

5. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:31:06 -0800
c
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00617.html (9,199 bytes)

6. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:31:42 -0800
.
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00618.html (8,994 bytes)

7. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: w Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:00:21 -0800 (PST)
z
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00745.html (11,292 bytes)

8. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:35:27 -0800
s
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00755.html (9,679 bytes)

9. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:19:54 -0800 (PST)
:
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00759.html (10,404 bytes)

10. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:44:39 -0200
d
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00761.html (11,636 bytes)

11. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: rew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:25:30 -0800
c
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00762.html (9,826 bytes)

12. Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:47:14 -0800 (PST)
We are seeing following assertions when running specweb99 with tcp_tso_win_divisor lowered to 4, 2 or 1 on linux 2.6.9 based kernels. KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) failed at net/core/stre
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01662.html (8,367 bytes)

13. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:47:55 -0800
The issue is if you change the value while there are still existing sockets which used a previous value at least once. Looks like we'll have to cache this inside of the per-socket structure to fix th
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01663.html (9,701 bytes)

14. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:39:42 +1100
Could you elaborate the code path that you've spotted that causes this when the divisor is changed? Perhaps we're not caching the MSS value everywhere where we should be? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01664.html (9,783 bytes)

15. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:59:18 +1100
2.6.9 is known to have bugs in TCP book-keeping. Please try 2.6.10-rc2 instead. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home P
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01665.html (9,404 bytes)

16. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:31:06 -0800
Actually, that's true. I missed that this report was against 2.6.9 vanilla, TCP is buggy as can be wrt TSO in that release.
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01671.html (9,290 bytes)

17. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:31:42 -0800
Currently I think your theory is better than mine, that 2.6.9 TCP is buggy wrt. TSO. :-)
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01672.html (9,081 bytes)

18. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Unfortunately as we cannot upgrade to 2.6.10-rc2, i tried to locate all the TSO accounting related bugfixes that went in after 2.6.9 and came up with the following 4 patches. [TCP]: Fix new packet le
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01799.html (11,492 bytes)

19. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:35:27 -0800
This doesn't work. You cannot expect upstream maintainers to work with you if you're not willing to or able to try things out with the latest kernels. I have an inkling as to the reason why you're re
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01809.html (9,862 bytes)

20. Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor (score: 1)
Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Yes. You are right. It is a vendor kernel based on 2.6.9 along with some vendor specific kernel patches. I agree that it is not always possible to support older kernels and i was not expecting you to
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01813.html (10,621 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu