- 1. Andi's patch (score: 1)
- Author: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:04:21 -0700 (MST)
- Andi, we'll try to look at your patch as soon as we can. Thanks for confirming the possibility of a problem. Right now we are going to patch supermon first to see if we can work around the problem, s
- /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00015.html (8,135 bytes)
- 2. Re: Andi's patch (score: 1)
- Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:07:57 +0100
- It's not really a proposed patch, but just to confirm that I diagnosed the problem correctly. The eventual goal (if that should be the problem) would be to fix the fast path to work for your workload
- /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00016.html (8,948 bytes)
- 3. Andi's patch (score: 1)
- Author: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:04:21 -0700 (MST)
- Andi, we'll try to look at your patch as soon as we can. Thanks for confirming the possibility of a problem. Right now we are going to patch supermon first to see if we can work around the problem, s
- /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00136.html (8,163 bytes)
- 4. Re: Andi's patch (score: 1)
- Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:07:57 +0100
- It's not really a proposed patch, but just to confirm that I diagnosed the problem correctly. The eventual goal (if that should be the problem) would be to fix the fast path to work for your workload
- /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00137.html (9,071 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu