Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*All\s+your\s+XFS\s+are\s+belong\s+to\s+SCO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*All\s+your\s+XFS\s+are\s+belong\s+to\s+SCO\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. All your XFS are belong to SCO (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:58:34 -0800 (PST); SCO has just expanded their lawsuit to claim ownership over XFS (and presumably, all of IRIX): http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040215015800694 "In Exhibit C, SCO sets forth additional code; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00203.html (7,876 bytes)
2. Re: All your XFS are belong to SCO (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:03:36 +0000; I think this the wrong list to ask. If you want some form of answer your best bet is to ask an executive, but even then I wouldn't want to guarantee for anything; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00204.html (7,651 bytes)
3. Re: All your XFS are belong to SCO (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:10:20 +1100; SGI's position is publically stated in the first paragraph here: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ and the letter it refers to, here: http://oss.sgi.com/letter_100103.txt cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00205.html (8,065 bytes)
4. All your XFS are belong to SCO (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:58:34 -0800 (PST); SGI, Inc; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00538.html (7,876 bytes)
5. Re: All your XFS are belong to SCO (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:03:36 +0000; onal code; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00539.html (7,651 bytes)
6. Re: All your XFS are belong to SCO (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:10:20 +1100; anything; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00540.html (8,065 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]