Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Addendum\s+to\s+FAQ\s+\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author: lambada@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:55:09 +0200 (CEST)
Every root logging is a potential proof of stupididy. It happens that since I had a problem (probably due to Nvidia drivers) with my xfs home partition, I typed mkfs.xfs and not fsck.xfs (by the way
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00092.html (7,792 bytes)

2. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Jul 2003 16:13:16 +0200
xfsdump is your friend :) In my company we do full backup every day with incremental backups during the day. BTW. mkfs.xfs should tell you that you are going to format device with existing filesystem
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00093.html (9,056 bytes)

3. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:22:20 +0200 (CEST)
It is a laptop, I was rebooting to connect a firewire CD-RW and dump my partition onto a CD-R. In fact, the problem occured this way I think : 1) I upgraded both kernel and NVidia drivers, hum upgra
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00094.html (10,165 bytes)

4. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: 10 Jul 2003 09:27:31 -0500
It should, that is what the -f option is for, of course, once you have run into it a few times you type -f without thinking about it. mkfs is probably simpler to recover from than rm -r -f, since rm
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00095.html (9,971 bytes)

5. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:09:31 +0200
At 16:22 10-7-2003 +0200, lambada@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Yes because some people are used to the unformat facility on MS systems and it only costs a line of FAQ : "by the way, unformat does not work nor ex
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00096.html (8,339 bytes)

6. Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:55:09 +0200 (CEST)
Every root logging is a potential proof of stupididy. It happens that since I had a problem (probably due to Nvidia drivers) with my xfs home partition, I typed mkfs.xfs and not fsck.xfs (by the way
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00424.html (7,792 bytes)

7. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx
Date: 10 Jul 2003 16:13:16 +0200
xfsdump is your friend :) In my company we do full backup every day with incremental backups during the day. BTW. mkfs.xfs should tell you that you are going to format device with existing filesystem
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00425.html (9,056 bytes)

8. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:22:20 +0200 (CEST)
It is a laptop, I was rebooting to connect a firewire CD-RW and dump my partition onto a CD-R. In fact, the problem occured this way I think : 1) I upgraded both kernel and NVidia drivers, hum upgra
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00426.html (10,165 bytes)

9. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx
Date: 10 Jul 2003 09:27:31 -0500
It should, that is what the -f option is for, of course, once you have run into it a few times you type -f without thinking about it. mkfs is probably simpler to recover from than rm -r -f, since rm
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00427.html (9,971 bytes)

10. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:09:31 +0200
At 16:22 10-7-2003 +0200, lambada@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Yes because some people are used to the unformat facility on MS systems and it only costs a line of FAQ : "by the way, unformat does not work nor ex
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00428.html (8,339 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu