Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Addendum\s+to\s+FAQ\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Addendum\s+to\s+FAQ\s+\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author: lambada@xxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:55:09 +0200 (CEST); Every root logging is a potential proof of stupididy. It happens that since I had a problem (probably due to Nvidia drivers) with my xfs home partition, I typed mkfs.xfs and not fsck.xfs (by the way; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00092.html (7,792 bytes)
2. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 10 Jul 2003 16:13:16 +0200; xfsdump is your friend :) In my company we do full backup every day with incremental backups during the day. BTW. mkfs.xfs should tell you that you are going to format device with existing filesystem; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00093.html (9,056 bytes)
3. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:22:20 +0200 (CEST); It is a laptop, I was rebooting to connect a firewire CD-RW and dump my partition onto a CD-R. In fact, the problem occured this way I think : 1) I upgraded both kernel and NVidia drivers, hum upgra; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00094.html (10,165 bytes)
4. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: 10 Jul 2003 09:27:31 -0500; It should, that is what the -f option is for, of course, once you have run into it a few times you type -f without thinking about it. mkfs is probably simpler to recover from than rm -r -f, since rm; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00095.html (9,971 bytes)
5. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:09:31 +0200; At 16:22 10-7-2003 +0200, lambada@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Yes because some people are used to the unformat facility on MS systems and it only costs a line of FAQ : "by the way, unformat does not work nor ex; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00096.html (8,339 bytes)
6. Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author: xxxx; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:55:09 +0200 (CEST); Every root logging is a potential proof of stupididy. It happens that since I had a problem (probably due to Nvidia drivers) with my xfs home partition, I typed mkfs.xfs and not fsck.xfs (by the way; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00424.html (7,792 bytes)
7. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author: xxxx; Date: 10 Jul 2003 16:13:16 +0200; xfsdump is your friend :) In my company we do full backup every day with incremental backups during the day. BTW. mkfs.xfs should tell you that you are going to format device with existing filesystem; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00425.html (9,056 bytes)
8. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:22:20 +0200 (CEST); It is a laptop, I was rebooting to connect a firewire CD-RW and dump my partition onto a CD-R. In fact, the problem occured this way I think : 1) I upgraded both kernel and NVidia drivers, hum upgra; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00426.html (10,165 bytes)
9. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author: xxxxx; Date: 10 Jul 2003 09:27:31 -0500; It should, that is what the -f option is for, of course, once you have run into it a few times you type -f without thinking about it. mkfs is probably simpler to recover from than rm -r -f, since rm; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00427.html (9,971 bytes)
10. Re: Addendum to FAQ ? (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:09:31 +0200; At 16:22 10-7-2003 +0200, lambada@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Yes because some people are used to the unformat facility on MS systems and it only costs a line of FAQ : "by the way, unformat does not work nor ex; /archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00428.html (8,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]