Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Acer\s+Aspire\s+1524WLMi\s+and\s+RealTek\s+8169\s+\-\s+very\s+slow\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Acer\s+Aspire\s+1524WLMi\s+and\s+RealTek\s+8169\s+\-\s+very\s+slow\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: rew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:42:29 +0000; Pa; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00832.html (12,134 bytes)
22. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: wig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:30:09 +0100; ac=; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00833.html (10,722 bytes)
23. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:07:27 +0000; g r; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00834.html (12,097 bytes)
24. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:36:41 +0000; ) =; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00901.html (10,063 bytes)
25. ne unable to send back-to-back packets? (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:52:15 -0600; ers, many of the register layouts are not documented in the sources s; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01036.html (9,812 bytes)
26. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:26:25 +0000; Hello. could you give the patch below some testing ? Any post-LLTX-revert 2.6.11-rc2-bk should do. Merge of Realtek's code - code dedicated to a new phy (spotted by Richard Dawe); - C+ register fiddl; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01189.html (12,084 bytes)
27. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 21:41:35 +0100; Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] So it can be considered that the link detection issue is gone. Ok, I'll ask Jeff to submit it for mainline. If this test is (sys) CPU bound, then you; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01193.html (11,625 bytes)
28. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:54:59 +0000; Hello. Francois Romieu wrote: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] [snip] It works fine setting the speed & duplex using "ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed <speed> duplex <duplex>". Nice.; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01210.html (11,024 bytes)
29. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:00:59 +0000; Hello. (it should apply correctly on top of you current setup) I can, with and without that patch. But I encounter problems bringing the interface back up and down again. If I do the following after; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01290.html (12,621 bytes)
30. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:07:32 +0100; Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] @#$*%! Patch against 2.6.11-rc3: http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/20050211-2.6.11-rc3-r8169-test.patch Better ? Up-to-date patch-script v; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01426.html (10,304 bytes)
31. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:36:23 +0000; Hello. I find that the "ip link set dev eth0 down" command hangs, consuming most of the CPU time (~99%). Note that I issued the "network" commands with about a second's delay between each command. @#; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01498.html (11,209 bytes)
32. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:51:21 +0000; Hello. IRQ routing seems to be disabled in 2.6.10. I got a warning about an unhandled interrupt for the VIA 8255 (I think that's the right number) on shutdown. I'm wondering if there is some bad inte; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01512.html (96,871 bytes)
33. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:23:37 +0000; Hello. Please see the attached, which are for running with 2.6.10. I included .config, Just In Case. [snip] Sorry, I booted into 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 by mistake. Attached are the ones from 2.6.10. Bye, Ri; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01513.html (95,274 bytes)
34. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:10:41 +0000; Hello. I created a bug in the kernel bug tracker for this issue: http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4049 I think it may just be an issue with x86_64 and ACPI, but I'm not sure yet. I don't yet hav; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02485.html (10,091 bytes)
35. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:22:57 +0000; Hello. I've done some more investigation and I'm happy to report that I managed to get some decent network performance out of my laptop - 7.1Mbps. My laptop seems to have an embedded PHY rather than; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02486.html (14,925 bytes)
36. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:01:56 +0100; Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] Nice. Have you checked that ethtool performs correctly when you try to set the link parameters with the new code (+ plug/unplug cable) ? I'll change t; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02497.html (10,502 bytes)
37. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:08:34 +0000; Hello. So I looked at the latest RealTek driver for Linux (version 220) and that has some separate initialisation code for RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_X (MCFG_METHOD_4, they call it). I ported that over to r816; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02512.html (12,924 bytes)
38. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:47:25 +0100; Hi, could you give the patch below some testing ? Any post-LLTX-revert 2.6.11-rc2-bk should do. Merge of Realtek's code - code dedicated to a new phy (spotted by Richard Dawe); - C+ register fiddling; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02611.html (15,926 bytes)
39. RE: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:00:22 -0800; & out You're running into the (in)famous ethtool vs autonegotiation issue. If you do ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 10 duplex half I think it will probably work. The behavior you're describing ap; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02670.html (9,207 bytes)
40. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:17:50 +0000; Hello. Francois Romieu wrote: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [snip] Sadly my box won't boot, if I disable ACPI. Can you give a look at: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=122145%22%; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01753.html (10,116 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]