Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+AW\:\s+best\s+kernel\s+version\s+to\s+use\s+with\s+XFS\+LVM\+MD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+AW\:\s+best\s+kernel\s+version\s+to\s+use\s+with\s+XFS\+LVM\+MD\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. +MD (score: 1): Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:36:55 +0100; filesystems original Uhh - that sounds like me when I must use vi in single user mode, because mc isn't work. If I compile and boot up a new kernel (and I never use RPM kernels), I let stay the curr; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00227.html (9,357 bytes)
2. +MD (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:41:18 +0100; Too many libraries linked against in the /usr filesystem to throw mc into /bin: $ ldd /usr/bin/mc libgpm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgpm.so.1 (0x4001c000) libglib-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 (0x40; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00228.html (8,994 bytes)
3. ar. (score: 1): Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:21:39 +0100; That's right. I have no experiences in LVM. Seems this a good design? My current config: 45GB IDE hda1 ( 16MB) -> /boot (ext2) hda2 ( 5GB) -> RAID1 part of LVM sysVG (current empty space) hda3 ( 8GB; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00236.html (10,860 bytes)
4. +LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:36:55 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00801.html (9,357 bytes)
5. +LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:41:18 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00802.html (8,994 bytes)
6. ichbar. (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:21:39 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00810.html (10,860 bytes)
7. AW: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:36:55 +0100; filesystems original Uhh - that sounds like me when I must use vi in single user mode, because mc isn't work. If I compile and boot up a new kernel (and I never use RPM kernels), I let stay the curr; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01375.html (9,397 bytes)
8. Re: AW: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:41:18 +0100; Too many libraries linked against in the /usr filesystem to throw mc into /bin: $ ldd /usr/bin/mc libgpm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgpm.so.1 (0x4001c000) libglib-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 (0x40; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01376.html (9,064 bytes)
9. AW: AW: best kernel version to use with XFS+LVM+MD (score: 1): Author: "mai99bxd" <mai99bxd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:21:39 +0100; Hi That's right. I have no experiences in LVM. Seems this a good design? My current config: 45GB IDE hda1 ( 16MB) -> /boot (ext2) hda2 ( 5GB) -> RAID1 part of LVM sysVG (current empty space) hda3 ( 8; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01384.html (10,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]