Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ARGH\s+MORE\s+BUGS\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ARGH\s+MORE\s+BUGS\!\!\!\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: tenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:04:08 +0100; Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with lowering the socket-buffer to see if the behaviour of a slowdown reappears at the same position. Result: With a 128 KB send-buffer, the s; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00756.html (8,527 bytes)
2. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:19:16 +0100; Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with lowering the socket-buffer to see if the behaviour of a slowdown reappears at the same position. Result: With a 128 KB send-buffer, the sl; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00760.html (9,825 bytes)
3. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:25:34 +0100; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx has been found in MAINTAINERS in the ipv4/ipv6 section ;) Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Christian Schmid wrote: Hi. Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with low; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00762.html (10,319 bytes)
4. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: anus <mcmanus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:28:54 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : What about monitoring /proc/slabinfo and vmstat output (with heavy renicing) ? -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00763.html (8,950 bytes)
5. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:34:18 +0100; (s02) [21:05:13] root:~# cat /proc/slabinfo slabinfo - version: 2.1 name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab> : tunables <batchcount> <limit> <sharedfactor> : slabdata <acti; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00764.html (23,572 bytes)
6. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:56:06 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Let's calm down, please. i=0 while : ; do cat /proc/slabinfo > /tmp/\$i i=$[ $i + 1 ] sleep 1 done EOD Wait a few minutes or more until the 5s pauses hap; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00766.html (9,026 bytes)
7. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:17:46 +0100; Its attached, since these are several files. your script didnt work. I used this one: /proc/slabinfo > /tmp/sl$_")}' I started it after one break-cyclus and stopped it immedately after the next break; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00768.html (9,969 bytes)
8. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:18:27 +0100; OOPS forgot the file.... *grin* Its attached, since these are several files. your script didnt work. I used this one: /proc/slabinfo > /tmp/sl$_")}' I started it after one break-cyclus and stopped it; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00769.html (10,060 bytes)
9. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:36:10 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : I'd welcome several cycles to feed the data through gnuplot. A sample based on 15 minutes or more would not hurt: I speak perl too. -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00770.html (9,178 bytes)
10. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:10:53 +0100; Francois Romieu wrote: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : I started it after one break-cyclus and stopped it immedately after the next break-cyclus ended. I'd welcome several cycles to fee; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00772.html (9,816 bytes)
11. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: ncois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:03:49 +0100; It suddenly appeared again. there you go.......... Francois Romieu wrote: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : I started it after one break-cyclus and stopped it immedately after the next br; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00782.html (10,139 bytes)
12. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:10:46 +0100; I FOUND IT!!! At least I were able to track this down very far. It seems it only appears on Port 80. So might there be a problem if too many sockets are sharing the same port? In this case, port 80?; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00783.html (10,044 bytes)
13. Re: argh more bugs!!! (score: 1): Author: eu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:23:15 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Thanks. I'll do some graphics tomorrow to be sure but the slabs do not seem wrong. vmstat output looks weird: procs --memory-- --swap-- --io-- --system--; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00784.html (10,970 bytes)
14. Re: argh more bugs!!! (score: 1): Author: is Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:37:46 +0100; OK the problem with the break is solved. I am REALLY sorry but it was not the net-code in linux. The SQL-Server has experienced an index-key collision as I added a second multi-key to it. It seems th; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00786.html (12,268 bytes)
15. ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:04:08 +0100; Hi. Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with lowering the socket-buffer to see if the behaviour of a slowdown reappears at the same position. Result: With a 128 KB send-buffer, th; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01776.html (8,637 bytes)
16. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:19:16 +0100; Hi. Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with lowering the socket-buffer to see if the behaviour of a slowdown reappears at the same position. Result: With a 128 KB send-buffer, t; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01780.html (10,077 bytes)
17. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:25:34 +0100; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx has been found in MAINTAINERS in the ipv4/ipv6 section ;) Hi. Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with lowering the socket-buffer to see if the behaviour of a s; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01782.html (10,609 bytes)
18. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:28:54 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] What about monitoring /proc/slabinfo and vmstat output (with heavy renicing) ? -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01783.html (8,998 bytes)
19. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:34:18 +0100; (s02) [21:05:13] root:~# cat /proc/slabinfo slabinfo - version: 2.1 name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab> : tunables <batchcount> <limit> <sharedfactor> : slabdata <acti; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01784.html (25,417 bytes)
20. Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!! (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:56:06 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] Let's calm down, please. i=0 while : ; do cat /proc/slabinfo > /tmp/\$i i=$[ $i + 1 ] sleep 1 done EOD Wait a few minutes or more until the 5s paus; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01786.html (9,124 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]