Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ANNOUNCE\s+XFS\s+1\.3\.0pre4\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xx
Date: 25 Jul 2003 16:44:32 -0500
The 1.3.0 pre4 patches and latest RH9 errata kernel rpms are available at: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/pre4/ The 1.3 xfs-cmds have also been updated to TOT xfs-cmds, since there is no
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00213.html (7,993 bytes)

2. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: 25 Jul 2003 17:11:53 -0500
The patches only affect XFS. The core kernel patches have not changed and will not change in the foreseeable future. They can be grabbed from: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/kernel_patche
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00214.html (10,030 bytes)

3. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 00:04:55 +0000
Just curious, maybe I missed something important but in the kernel-patches-directory there is no kernel-version given. So for which kernels are these patches at all? Thanks in advance, Thomas
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00215.html (9,201 bytes)

4. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 01:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
May I propose a little change in the package name for future releases. IIRC rpm considers kernel-2.4.20-18.9XFS1.3.0pre4 older than kernel-2.4.20-18.9. Now if you 'rpm -Fvh *' in a directory which i
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00216.html (9,686 bytes)

5. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 02:10:08 +0200
Appending to the rpm's release makes the release always newer, so the scenario you describe shouldn't happen. Maybe you upgraded an XFS 18 to a non-XFS 19 release? That could happen. If you want to a
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00217.html (10,780 bytes)

6. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 02:23:15 +0200 (CEST)
You're right, shame on me. I had the old naming in mind which was once used with an XFS installer where names would be in the form kernel-2.4.20-18XFS1.3.0pre4 which was considerd older than kernel-
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00218.html (11,534 bytes)

7. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:26:31 -0700
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 01:36:16AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: The 1.3.0 pre4 patches and latest RH9 errata kernel rpms are available at: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/pre4/ The 1.3 xfs-c
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00219.html (12,253 bytes)

8. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:17:17 +1000
Ah, I botched the Makefile. Hmm - looks like your compiler doesn't like this, but mine does. Oh well, thats easily corrected - I'll checkin a fix shortly. thanks. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00222.html (9,862 bytes)

9. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:39:40 -0700
On 07/27/03 14:17, Nathan Scott wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:26:31PM -0700, Net Llama! wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 01:36:16AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: Rebuilding the xfs_progs SRPM is bombi
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00223.html (11,158 bytes)

10. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:43:54 +0300 (EEST)
Great job, I am starting to move some of the machines arround here on 2.4.21 XFS 1.3.0pre couse if any bugs are there they should pop-up before 1.3.0 final. One small issue I noticed after booting a
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00235.html (9,619 bytes)

11. ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx
Date: 25 Jul 2003 16:44:32 -0500
The 1.3.0 pre4 patches and latest RH9 errata kernel rpms are available at: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/pre4/ The 1.3 xfs-cmds have also been updated to TOT xfs-cmds, since there is no
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00545.html (7,993 bytes)

12. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: 25 Jul 2003 17:11:53 -0500
The patches only affect XFS. The core kernel patches have not changed and will not change in the foreseeable future. They can be grabbed from: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/kernel_patche
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00546.html (10,030 bytes)

13. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 00:04:55 +0000
Just curious, maybe I missed something important but in the kernel-patches-directory there is no kernel-version given. So for which kernels are these patches at all? Thanks in advance, Thomas
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00547.html (9,201 bytes)

14. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 01:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
May I propose a little change in the package name for future releases. IIRC rpm considers kernel-2.4.20-18.9XFS1.3.0pre4 older than kernel-2.4.20-18.9. Now if you 'rpm -Fvh *' in a directory which i
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00548.html (9,686 bytes)

15. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 02:10:08 +0200
Appending to the rpm's release makes the release always newer, so the scenario you describe shouldn't happen. Maybe you upgraded an XFS 18 to a non-XFS 19 release? That could happen. If you want to a
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00549.html (10,780 bytes)

16. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 02:23:15 +0200 (CEST)
You're right, shame on me. I had the old naming in mind which was once used with an XFS installer where names would be in the form kernel-2.4.20-18XFS1.3.0pre4 which was considerd older than kernel-
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00550.html (11,534 bytes)

17. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:26:31 -0700
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 01:36:16AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: The 1.3.0 pre4 patches and latest RH9 errata kernel rpms are available at: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/pre4/ The 1.3 xfs-c
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00551.html (12,253 bytes)

18. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:17:17 +1000
Ah, I botched the Makefile. Hmm - looks like your compiler doesn't like this, but mine does. Oh well, thats easily corrected - I'll checkin a fix shortly. thanks. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00554.html (9,862 bytes)

19. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:39:40 -0700
On 07/27/03 14:17, Nathan Scott wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:26:31PM -0700, Net Llama! wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 01:36:16AM +0200, Simon Matter wrote: Rebuilding the xfs_progs SRPM is bombi
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00555.html (11,158 bytes)

20. Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:43:54 +0300 (EEST)
Great job, I am starting to move some of the machines arround here on 2.4.21 XFS 1.3.0pre couse if any bugs are there they should pop-up before 1.3.0 final. One small issue I noticed after booting a
/archives/xfs/2003-07/msg00567.html (9,619 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu