Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ANNOUCEMENT\:\s+XFS\s+support\s+to\s+the\s+\-mjc\s+2\.4\.17\s+branch\s+\(fwd\)\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. ANNOUCEMENT: XFS support to the -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 07:44:51 +1100
For those not on linux-kernel, the -mjc branch is trying to take up on 2.4 where -ac left off. -- Forwarded Message It's been running for 8 hours. There's still a little work to go but so far It's up
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00016.html (7,996 bytes)

2. Re: ANNOUCEMENT: XFS support to the -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:04:13 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox isn't working on kernel mods, anymore?
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00017.html (8,741 bytes)

3. Re: ANNOUCEMENT: XFS support to the -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Jan 2002 16:04:26 -0600
No, he decided not to do the 2.4 leg, and I can't blame him, think what a few years of merging countless patches would do to you. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesy
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00018.html (8,590 bytes)

4. Re: ANNOUCEMENT: XFS support to the -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:17:12 +0100 (CET)
Excellent, our userbase just upped by a couple of thousand :-) That's a nice new year presemt isn't it? Happy new Year everyone. (Yeah I know I'm late). Cheers Seth
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00020.html (8,790 bytes)

5. tion un(mount|repairable) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:05:30 -0500 (EST)
It should be going in soon, Just trying to keep up to your TAKEs in CVS :) Linux coredump 2.4.18pre1-mjc3-xfs #2 Tue Jan 8 23:54:58 EST 2002 i586 unknown 9:04pm up 20:59, 7 users, load average: 0.38,
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00286.html (9,594 bytes)

6. -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:23:28 -0500 (EST)
has that been put into the main XFS cvs tree (?) Shawn.
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00287.html (9,266 bytes)

7. (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:32:15 -0600 (CST)
Hi Shawn - How are you doing it now? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00289.html (8,618 bytes)

8. -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:44:06 -0500 (EST)
Well, i have my 2.4.18-pre1-mjc3p1-xfs branch which contans a whole bunch of other patches (preempting + ide + riel's rmap patch and others). I basically have to manually edit the files to make sure
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00290.html (9,156 bytes)

9. -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:44:37 -0500 (EST)
I'd say its a pretty messy MESSY way of doing it :-( Shawn.
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00291.html (9,471 bytes)

10. -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:51:59 +1100
Have you looked at ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches? There are XFS split patches there, the split for 2.4.17 is on hold while a few problems are being tracked down.
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00292.html (9,193 bytes)

11. -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:57:13 -0500 (EST)
I'm on a moving target so if things break they break. But i'm not sure. User's using my patch have not had file corruption or such. But aside from that fxc program which seems to cause problems with
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00293.html (9,553 bytes)

12. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:38:53 +0100
At 21:23 9-1-2002 -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: has that been put into the main XFS cvs tree (?) No, we normally don't apply outside patches to the CVS tree. It already has the kdb patch in which is as f
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00296.html (8,698 bytes)

13. c 2.4.17 (was Quota diff) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: 10 Jan 2002 09:44:27 -0500
Yes, But now I have to catch up to his latest tree (mjc3p2) so I have some work to do :-)
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00299.html (17,297 bytes)

14. -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: 10 Jan 2002 08:48:32 -0600
It does not cause any problems in our tree - it has been running for about 18 hours here without a snag now. Are you saying that the tree it was dying in was the mjc branch? Steve -- Steve Lord voice
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00300.html (9,353 bytes)

15. 2.4.16 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:18:30 -0500 (EST)
Another person and I have decided to stop -mjc porting for now. because we dont know what will break XFS. so we're forming out own branch and using some patches from -mjc but at a slower pace (first
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00350.html (9,683 bytes)

16. -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:51:15 +1100
The XFS split patches for 2.4.17 are now available, they might help. ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/2.4.17
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00351.html (9,078 bytes)

17. tion during emacs build on XFS logical volume (score: 1)
Author: ums@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 07:44:51 +1100
For those not on linux-kernel, the -mjc branch is trying to take up on 2.4 where -ac left off. -- Forwarded Message It's been running for 8 hours. There's still a little work to go but so far It's up
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00945.html (7,996 bytes)

18. : XFS support to the -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:04:13 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox isn't working on kernel mods, anymore?
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00946.html (8,741 bytes)

19. : XFS support to the -mjc 2.4.17 branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Jan 2002 16:04:26 -0600
No, he decided not to do the 2.4 leg, and I can't blame him, think what a few years of merging countless patches would do to you. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesy
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00947.html (8,590 bytes)

20. branch (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: ie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:17:12 +0100 (CET)
Excellent, our userbase just upped by a couple of thousand :-) That's a nice new year presemt isn't it? Happy new Year everyone. (Yeah I know I'm late). Cheers Seth
/archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00949.html (8,790 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu