Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+few\s+questions\s+regarding\s+XFS\s+1\.2\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:22:50 +0100
Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00235.html (7,548 bytes)

2. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:50:30 -0800
The SGI people have abundant time on their hands but wish to deprive you of the latest code in the installer. --cw
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00236.html (7,971 bytes)

3. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:56:35 +0100
Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 09:22:50PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00237.html (8,809 bytes)

4. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Feb 2003 14:59:16 -0600
The re-spin of the installer was done in about an hour. I probably missed updating my build scripts with the new names/versions. If I find some time I'll look at fixing that but no promises. -- Russe
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00238.html (8,478 bytes)

5. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:04:32 +0100
Russell Cattelan wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:22, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.1
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00239.html (8,823 bytes)

6. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:06:19 +0100
At 21:22 17-2-2003 +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS director
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00240.html (8,432 bytes)

7. A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:22:50 +0100
Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00719.html (7,548 bytes)

8. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:50:30 -0800
The SGI people have abundant time on their hands but wish to deprive you of the latest code in the installer. --cw
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00720.html (7,971 bytes)

9. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:56:35 +0100
Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 09:22:50PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00721.html (8,809 bytes)

10. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Feb 2003 14:59:16 -0600
The re-spin of the installer was done in about an hour. I probably missed updating my build scripts with the new names/versions. If I find some time I'll look at fixing that but no promises. -- Russe
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00722.html (8,478 bytes)

11. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:04:32 +0100
Russell Cattelan wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:22, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.1
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00723.html (8,823 bytes)

12. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:06:19 +0100
At 21:22 17-2-2003 +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS director
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg00724.html (8,432 bytes)

13. A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:22:50 +0100
Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01203.html (7,593 bytes)

14. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:50:30 -0800
The SGI people have abundant time on their hands but wish to deprive you of the latest code in the installer. --cw
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01204.html (8,019 bytes)

15. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:56:35 +0100
The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why? The SGI people h
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01205.html (8,693 bytes)

16. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Feb 2003 14:59:16 -0600
The re-spin of the installer was done in about an hour. I probably missed updating my build scripts with the new names/versions. If I find some time I'll look at fixing that but no promises. -- Russe
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01206.html (8,526 bytes)

17. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:04:32 +0100
Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01207.html (8,997 bytes)

18. Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:06:19 +0100
The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why? Also, The attr pa
/archives/xfs/2003-02/msg01208.html (8,606 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu