Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4k\s+drives\:\s+benefits\s+and\s+models\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4k\s+drives\:\s+benefits\s+and\s+models\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 4k drives: benefits and models? (score: 1): Author: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:21:41 +0200; Hi, I've been reading the "4k drive" thread with interest and I have a few questions: - what are the benefits of these new drives? Speed, temperature, reliability? - what specific HD models are truel; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00319.html (7,338 bytes)
2. Re: 4k drives: benefits and models? (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:05:02 +0200; ATM we are in a transition phase - there are first drives available, and it will take some time until every hardware and software piece is fully able to support 4K sectors. Probably all hard disk ma; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00322.html (10,044 bytes)
3. Re: 4k drives: benefits and models? (score: 1): Author: pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi); Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:35:39 +0100; It is purely higher density. A longer physical sector means less percentage of the disk is "wasted" on metadata. This benefits the manufacturer mostly, so they can claim more capacity with less cost; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00324.html (9,052 bytes)
4. Re: 4k drives: benefits and models? (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:07:08 +0200; Le Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:35:39 +0100 pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi) écrivait: It isn't actually that simple. By keeping the same metadata ratio, the largest correctable error goes up from 10; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00326.html (9,358 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]