- 21. Re: 3c59x (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
- No end user will see the change then, no distribution vendor worth their salt will ship with MMIO enabled. Right now we get only PIO and everybody suffers. Runtime MMIO selection is a net win for eve
- /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01189.html (10,073 bytes)
- 22. Re: 3c59x (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
- you could just test once during driver init and setup an indirection to the appropriate function. its a little better than test and branch. Function calls are actually more expensive, you eat an ent
- /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01190.html (10,130 bytes)
- 23. Re: 3c59x (score: 1)
- Author: chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:39:15 -0400
- i was thinking you could do it higher up, like around the hard_start_xmit level. this would create a bit of replicated code, but you could abuse the preprocessor a bit i imagine.
- /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01192.html (9,648 bytes)
- 24. Re: 3c59x (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
- 3c59x already does this, so now we'd have 4 different copies.
- /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01193.html (10,052 bytes)
- 25. Re: 3c59x (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:20:52 -0400
- For 3c59x and select other drivers, I agree 100% If we are making a general rule, I do not agree... Jeff
- /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01201.html (10,436 bytes)
- 26. Re: 3c59x (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
- For 3c59x and select other drivers, I agree 100% If we are making a general rule, I do not agree... I think we agree then.
- /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01202.html (10,115 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu