Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3c59x\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3c59x\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:02:09 -0700 (PDT); t work.; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00282.html (9,938 bytes)
2. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:12:19 -0700 (PDT); s idea.; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00283.html (11,443 bytes)
3. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:16:17 -0400; ying th; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00284.html (10,288 bytes)
4. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: em@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:18:16 +0200; g. Jeff; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00285.html (10,683 bytes)
5. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:14:52 -0700 (PDT); . -Andi; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00286.html (9,924 bytes)
6. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:25:56 -0400; keep in; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00288.html (10,529 bytes)
7. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: m@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:29:54 -0400; o. Jeff; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00289.html (9,591 bytes)
8. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:30:30 -0700 (PDT); branch.; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00290.html (9,948 bytes)
9. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:31:11 -0700 (PDT); for eve; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00291.html (10,032 bytes)
10. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:39:15 -0400; achine.; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00293.html (9,611 bytes)
11. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT); magine.; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00294.html (9,945 bytes)
12. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:20:52 -0400; mic pro; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00302.html (10,264 bytes)
13. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:21:26 -0700 (PDT); .. Jeff; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg00303.html (9,988 bytes)
14. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:02:09 -0700 (PDT); This means end users don't see the benefit, so I definitely prefer Andi's idea.; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01181.html (10,073 bytes)
15. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:12:19 -0700 (PDT); With this driver I would typically get TCP bandwidth figures 4-5 Mbps lower than those obtained with 3c59x and noticable difference in the parallel jobs timing (using MPI over TCP). I'm not saying th; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01182.html (11,577 bytes)
16. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:16:17 -0400; Making every IO a conditional branch? Ug. Jeff; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01183.html (10,470 bytes)
17. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:18:16 +0200; An IO takes hundreds or even thousands of cycles. The test and branch is completely lost in the noise. I bet you won't be able to measure a difference on any modern CPU. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01184.html (10,885 bytes)
18. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:14:52 -0700 (PDT); Making every IO a conditional branch? Ug. A PIO costs hundreds if not thousands of instructions! Come on Jeff, get real :-); /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01185.html (10,049 bytes)
19. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:25:56 -0400; MMIO isn't as bad as PIO, and the 'runtime choice' setup implies slowing down the MMIO path, too. Jeff; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01187.html (10,701 bytes)
20. Re: 3c59x (score: 1): Author: chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:29:54 -0400; you could just test once during driver init and setup an indirection to the appropriate function. its a little better than test and branch.; /archives/netdev/2003-06/msg01188.html (9,619 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]