Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\s+questions\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: Libor Vaněk <libor@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:25:23 +0200
I'd like to ask 2 small yes/no questions about XFS: - does XFS support fs resising? - is there any way how to have physicaly more (Linux) machines which would act like one big XFS (probably all driv
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00085.html (7,423 bytes)

2. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:56:36 +0200
I'd like to ask 2 small yes/no questions about XFS: - does XFS support fs resising? Only larger, shrinking is not supported. - is there any way how to have physicaly more (Linux) machines which would
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00086.html (8,403 bytes)

3. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 00:00:47 +1000
Yes XFS supports online fs enlarging - but shrinking has not been immplemented. http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#usexfslvm http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#resizexfspartition I'm unsu
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00087.html (8,379 bytes)

4. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:04:49 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1D657306; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Libor Vaněk <libor@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00088.html (9,187 bytes)

5. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:35:29 +0200
Please - can you send me some more information about network block devices? I absolutely doesn't know what it is and how to use it ;) Thanks, Libor [[HTML alternate version deleted]]
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00094.html (8,675 bytes)

6. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 02:57:04 +1000
Network block devices are a way to mount a raw disk volume across a network. Think of it as RAID1 but over a network. They are very useful as a HA solution. There are a couple of them for Linux - the
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00095.html (8,516 bytes)

7. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: 16 Apr 2002 10:05:27 -0500
If you mount one xfs filesystem from several hosts like this then you are heading for data corruption very quickly. There is no way to manage cache coherency between the machines in this setup, and a
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00132.html (9,713 bytes)

8. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:55:48 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEE057306; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:55:49 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, "Libor Vaněk" <
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00140.html (11,963 bytes)

9. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: 17 Apr 2002 08:37:42 -0500
That should work just fine, I was interpreting things differently, mounts on all the nodes, not just on one node. I was wading through 12 days of email backlog at the time. Steve -- Steve Lord voice:
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00150.html (10,383 bytes)

10. 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:25:23 +0200
I'd like to ask 2 small yes/no questions about XFS: - does XFS support fs resising? - is there any way how to have physicaly more (Linux) machines which would act like one big XFS (probably all driv
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00629.html (7,423 bytes)

11. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:56:36 +0200
I'd like to ask 2 small yes/no questions about XFS: - does XFS support fs resising? Only larger, shrinking is not supported. - is there any way how to have physicaly more (Linux) machines which would
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00630.html (8,403 bytes)

12. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 00:00:47 +1000
Yes XFS supports online fs enlarging - but shrinking has not been immplemented. http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#usexfslvm http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#resizexfspartition I'm unsu
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00631.html (8,379 bytes)

13. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:04:49 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1D657306; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Libor Vaněk <libor@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxx
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00632.html (9,187 bytes)

14. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:35:29 +0200
Please - can you send me some more information about network block devices? I absolutely doesn't know what it is and how to use it ;) Thanks, Libor [[HTML alternate version deleted]]
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00638.html (8,675 bytes)

15. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 02:57:04 +1000
Network block devices are a way to mount a raw disk volume across a network. Think of it as RAID1 but over a network. They are very useful as a HA solution. There are a couple of them for Linux - the
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00639.html (8,516 bytes)

16. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: 16 Apr 2002 10:05:27 -0500
If you mount one xfs filesystem from several hosts like this then you are heading for data corruption very quickly. There is no way to manage cache coherency between the machines in this setup, and a
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00676.html (9,713 bytes)

17. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:55:48 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEE057306; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:55:49 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, "Libor Vaněk" <
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00684.html (11,963 bytes)

18. Re: 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: 17 Apr 2002 08:37:42 -0500
That should work just fine, I was interpreting things differently, mounts on all the nodes, not just on one node. I was wading through 12 days of email backlog at the time. Steve -- Steve Lord voice:
/archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00694.html (10,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu