Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.9\:\s+unkillable\s+processes\s+during\s+heavy\s+IO\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:01:56 -0800
yup, that looks like a locking tangle in the XFS direct-io code. Nathan, this is 2.6.9.
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00057.html (68,307 bytes)

2. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:55:06 +1100
Hmmm, yeah, looks like it - bother. Brad, could you send me details on how you've setup mysqld and how to generate a load similar to yours, so that I can reproduce the hang locally? ( I don't even kn
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00058.html (9,327 bytes)

3. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: Brad Fitzpatrick <brad@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:00:41 -0800 (PST)
The MySQL people made a tool to reproduce MySQL-like load for the specific purpose of not putting you through the database setup pain: http://sysbench.sourceforge.net/ To simulate our InnoDB: -- use
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00059.html (10,297 bytes)

4. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:01 +1100
Ah, fantastic. I've reproduced it now with this tool and a simplified version of your recipe - I'll have a fix for you to try before too long. Yep, it sure did. thanks! -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00066.html (9,105 bytes)

5. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:59:37 +1100
Looks like a lock order problem - I have an experimental fix, I'll send it to you shortly. thanks. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00084.html (8,783 bytes)

6. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:01:56 -0800
yup, that looks like a locking tangle in the XFS direct-io code. Nathan, this is 2.6.9.
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00227.html (68,307 bytes)

7. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:55:06 +1100
Hmmm, yeah, looks like it - bother. Brad, could you send me details on how you've setup mysqld and how to generate a load similar to yours, so that I can reproduce the hang locally? ( I don't even kn
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00228.html (9,327 bytes)

8. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: s@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:00:41 -0800 (PST)
The MySQL people made a tool to reproduce MySQL-like load for the specific purpose of not putting you through the database setup pain: http://sysbench.sourceforge.net/ To simulate our InnoDB: -- use
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00229.html (10,297 bytes)

9. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:05:01 +1100
Ah, fantastic. I've reproduced it now with this tool and a simplified version of your recipe - I'll have a fix for you to try before too long. Yep, it sure did. thanks! -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00236.html (9,105 bytes)

10. Re: 2.6.9: unkillable processes during heavy IO (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:59:37 +1100
Looks like a lock order problem - I have an experimental fix, I'll send it to you shortly. thanks. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00254.html (8,783 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu