Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.8\.1\s+IPv6\s+Routing\s+Problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.8\.1\s+IPv6\s+Routing\s+Problem\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. l a Merry Christmas (score: 1): Author: nav" <pranav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:54:15 +0100; ,blessings of CHRISTmas to you all ,your family and this World. With Regards, Pranav.; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00656.html (9,650 bytes)
2. face still possible (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 13:56:50 -0800; havior still by design? I'm not happy about this because if the link-local address is removed, it can't be added easily anymore. "howto": 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,M; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00661.html (10,548 bytes)
3. 90: network driver. (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 16:45:00 +1100; we can figure out whether this is necessary or not. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ho; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00666.html (8,311 bytes)
4. 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 01:08:03 +0200; someth; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00736.html (12,915 bytes)
5. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:43:04 +0900 (JST); Leonid; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00739.html (9,474 bytes)
6. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: ma@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:02:11 +0200; , jamal; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00760.html (11,698 bytes)
7. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:06:47 -0700; 8/inclu; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00764.html (11,958 bytes)
8. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:11:41 +0900 (JST); off-by:; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00765.html (10,081 bytes)
9. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:20:09 +0900 (JST); , crani; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00767.html (10,760 bytes)
10. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:46:05 +0200; socket; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00773.html (10,648 bytes)
11. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: ert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:08:36 +0300 (EEST); d stage; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00824.html (9,620 bytes)
12. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:20:12 +0900 (JST); and run; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00825.html (11,148 bytes)
13. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: u <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:57:52 -0700; rs, jamal; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00964.html (9,590 bytes)
14. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:06:30 +0900 (JST); heers, ja; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg00967.html (10,052 bytes)
15. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:54:15 +0100; Getting back to an ooooold thread... As far as I can see (please correct me) no such patch was included so far, at least with 2.6.10-rc3 I still have the old behaviour. Could you please include the p; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01607.html (10,014 bytes)
16. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 13:56:50 -0800; This specific issue was not resolved, but the issue of loading the ipv6 module after bringing up your interfaces was fixed via this patch below. I've also discussed this with Herbert Xu a bit, and no; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01612.html (10,888 bytes)
17. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 16:45:00 +1100; Well I still reckon that the IPv4 behaviour is just fine as it is. In fact if anything we should make the IPv6 case as similar to Ipv4 as possible. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.or; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01617.html (8,393 bytes)
18. 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 01:08:03 +0200; Hi! I'm experiencing some strange problems on a 2.6.8.1 vanilla kernel. I tried to reproduce it with a minimal system: 1) address configuration (just loopback, link-local and one global) /proc/sys/ne; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02192.html (12,930 bytes)
19. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:43:04 +0900 (JST); It is not minimum with ip6tables. :-) Anyway, please try the latest bk tree. There are may fixes in it. Thanks. --yoshfuji; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02195.html (9,532 bytes)
20. Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem (score: 1): Author: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:02:11 +0200; i just added ip6tables to get some log messages on incoming/outgoing packets (small embedded system with no tcpdump). In fact the problem disappeared with 2.6.9-rc2. I thought the idea of 2.6.8.x is; /archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02216.html (11,824 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]