Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.30\-rc6\:\s+BUG\s+at\s+fs\/xfs\/support\/debug\.c\:109\!\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:22:56 +0400
Hi Assertion failed: *nmap >= 1, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 4846 --[ cut here ]-- kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC last sysfs file:
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00002.html (10,307 bytes)

2. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:09:29 -0500
Hi Assertion failed: *nmap >= 1, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 4846 Alexander, what test triggered this assertion? --[ cut here ]-- kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! invalid opcode: 0000 [#
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00003.html (11,085 bytes)

3. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:38:07 +0400
2009/6/1 Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>: It was Gentoo's `emerge --metadata`. It reads many small files (ebuilds). I am sure it cannot be easily reproduced. It runs fine everyday. I do not have a te
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00005.html (11,850 bytes)

4. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:43:11 +0400
By the way, Felix, your last pull request was a month ago. Final release of 2.6.30 is coming soon, could you please send the fixes to Linus? Just in case you do not read LKML.
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00006.html (9,379 bytes)

5. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:53:19 -0500
By the way, Felix, your last pull request was a month ago. Final release of 2.6.30 is coming soon, could you please send the fixes to Linus? Just in case you do not read LKML. Yes, I do. And it is o
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00007.html (8,834 bytes)

6. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:58:56 -0500
It was Gentoo's `emerge --metadata`. It reads many small files (ebuilds). I am sure it cannot be easily reproduced. Right. Otherwise many more people would've reported it. It runs fine everyday. I do
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00008.html (9,378 bytes)

7. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:21:47 +0400
2009/6/1 Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>: The host is still running, SysRq-W shows two precesses with the same stacktraces. SysRq : Show Blocked State task PC stack pid father emerge D 00000000000000
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00013.html (13,497 bytes)

8. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:32:32 +0400
Again similar trace: Assertion failed: *nmap >= 1, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 4846 --[ cut here ]-- kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00015.html (12,869 bytes)

9. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:23:30 +1000
..... I'd say this indicates a corrupted directory. Can you run 'xfs_repair -n' over the filesystem and see if it finds a bad directory? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00052.html (9,231 bytes)

10. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:23:38 +0400
2009/6/4 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Hi Dave It is a rootfs. xfs_repair found and fixed all errors, but after reboot the problem still persists (but at another stage of running `emerge`). loc
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00066.html (12,441 bytes)

11. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:21:20 +0400
2009/6/5 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>: Still cannot fix the filesystem. After repairing all corruptions from LiveCD it still fails on the same workload. Do you need metadump or anythin
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00003.html (9,554 bytes)

12. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:52:36 -0400 (EDT)
Alexander, Are you running with this fix? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.29.y.git;a=commitdiff;h=d415867e0abc35e3b2f0d4196e98c339d6fe29a2 I've seen this assertion before a
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00010.html (9,829 bytes)

13. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:38:36 +0400
2009/7/2 Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>: Yes, I use 2.6.31-rc1-git and it contains this fix.
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00019.html (11,546 bytes)

14. Re: 2.6.30-rc6: BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:109! (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:42:12 -0500
Assertion failed: *nmap >= 1, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 4846 FWIW the same thing was just reported in oss bugzilla: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=850 same backtrace more or less, a
/archives/xfs/2009-09/msg00188.html (10,433 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu