Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.11\s+on\s+AMD64\s+traps\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:35:41 +0100
[just adding netdev to CC, from LKML] Michal Vanco wrote: Hello, I see this problem running 2.6.11 on dual AMD64: Running quagga routing daemon (ospf+bgp) and issuing "netstat -rn |wc -l" command whi
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00498.html (10,285 bytes)

2. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: r@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:45:35 +0100
Michal Vanco wrote: I see this problem running 2.6.11 on dual AMD64: Running quagga routing daemon (ospf+bgp) and issuing "netstat -rn |wc -l" command while quagga tries to load more than 154000 rout
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00556.html (10,494 bytes)

3. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:24:34 +0100
Well. Trap vanished after applying this patch, but another weird thing occurs: 156033 Wed Mar 9 22:15:21 CET 2005 real 0m0.656s user 0m0.415s sys 0m0.242s Wed Mar 9 22:15:22 CET 2005 real 6m41.472s u
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00580.html (10,083 bytes)

4. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:34:56 +0100
Michal Vanco wrote: On Wednesday 09 March 2005 20:45, Patrick McHardy wrote: This patch should fix it. The crash is caused by stale pointers, the pointers in fib_iter_state are not reloaded after seq
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00583.html (9,886 bytes)

5. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:42:49 +0100
Sure. Can (or will) this ever be fixed to any usable state also with netstat? Is this problem related only to AMD64? regards, -- Ing. Michal VanÄo Network Engineer SATRO s.r.o. e-mail: vanco@xxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00584.html (9,861 bytes)

6. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:05:27 +0100
Michal Vanco wrote: On Wednesday 09 March 2005 21:34, Patrick McHardy wrote: Yes, I know it is totally inefficient. Just use ip route, which doesn't suffer from this problem. Sure. Can (or will) this
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00585.html (9,450 bytes)

7. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:17:00 +0100
Ok. Thank's for help. regards, Michal Attachment: pgp2ydV7vxAmA.pgp Description: PGP signature
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00586.html (9,687 bytes)

8. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:27:05 +0100
Michal Vanco wrote: On Wednesday 09 March 2005 22:05, Patrick McHardy wrote: Sure. Can (or will) this ever be fixed to any usable state also with netstat? Is this problem related only to AMD64? Maybe
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00609.html (13,592 bytes)

9. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:50:05 +0100
Wonderfull: 155991 real 0m1.110s user 0m0.441s sys 0m1.100s 155991 real 0m1.435s user 0m1.026s sys 0m0.436s It seems that netlink is still little bit faster than /proc, but it doesn't make any sense
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00613.html (10,142 bytes)

10. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:57:56 +0100
155991 real 0m1.110s user 0m0.441s sys 0m1.100s 155991 real 0m1.435s user 0m1.026s sys 0m0.436s It seems that netlink is still little bit faster than /proc, but it doesn't make any sense in case like
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00616.html (13,959 bytes)

11. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:43:04 -0800
No objection :-) I'll hit this on my next pass over my 2.6.x backlog which should start tonight.
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00622.html (8,871 bytes)

12. ter: fixed ippp2 out ippp2" (score: 1)
Author: kpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:20:44 -0800
Applied, thanks Patrick.
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00707.html (9,216 bytes)

13. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:35:41 +0100
[just adding netdev to CC, from LKML] I see this problem running 2.6.11 on dual AMD64: Running quagga routing daemon (ospf+bgp) and issuing "netstat -rn |wc -l" command while quagga tries to load mor
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02421.html (10,202 bytes)

14. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:45:35 +0100
I see this problem running 2.6.11 on dual AMD64: Running quagga routing daemon (ospf+bgp) and issuing "netstat -rn |wc -l" command while quagga tries to load more than 154000 routes from its bgp neig
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02479.html (10,639 bytes)

15. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Michal Vanco <vanco@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:24:34 +0100
Well. Trap vanished after applying this patch, but another weird thing occurs: 156033 Wed Mar 9 22:15:21 CET 2005 real 0m0.656s user 0m0.415s sys 0m0.242s Wed Mar 9 22:15:22 CET 2005 real 6m41.472s u
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02503.html (10,212 bytes)

16. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:34:56 +0100
This patch should fix it. The crash is caused by stale pointers, the pointers in fib_iter_state are not reloaded after seq->stop() followed by seq->start(pos > 0). Well. Trap vanished after applying
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02506.html (9,954 bytes)

17. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Michal Vanco <vanco@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:42:49 +0100
Sure. Can (or will) this ever be fixed to any usable state also with netstat? Is this problem related only to AMD64? regards, -- Ing. Michal Vano Network Engineer SATRO s.r.o. e-mail: vanco@xxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02507.html (10,002 bytes)

18. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:05:27 +0100
Yes, I know it is totally inefficient. Just use ip route, which doesn't suffer from this problem. Sure. Can (or will) this ever be fixed to any usable state also with netstat? Is this problem related
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02508.html (9,633 bytes)

19. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Michal Vanco <vanco@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:17:00 +0100
Ok. Thank's for help. regards, Michal Attachment: pgpWqUbnzHP4g.pgp Description: PGP signature
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02509.html (9,827 bytes)

20. Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:27:05 +0100
Sure. Can (or will) this ever be fixed to any usable state also with netstat? Is this problem related only to AMD64? Maybe. To start dumping entries of an open hashed hash-table at a specific positi
/archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02532.html (13,753 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu