Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.10\s+dst\s+cache\s+overflow\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.10\s+dst\s+cache\s+overflow\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: is <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:40:13 +0100; Hi list, I was directed to this list for my question. I searched many archives but could not find any recent posts about this subject so I ask again. I have a linux (Fedora core 3) based router. I do; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00572.html (7,702 bytes)
2. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:44:02 -0500; J. Simonetti wrote: I have a linux (Fedora core 3) based router. I does approximately 50Mbps aggregated traffic. However once every week (approx) the router dies with 'kernel: dst cache overflow' mes; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00577.html (8,705 bytes)
3. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:28:31 +0100; Hello! Very recently here on netdev "Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1" was discussed this resulted in: and a similar patch for ipv6. Should be a start. --ro; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00578.html (9,352 bytes)
4. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: . Biederman); Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:11:57 -0500; Robert Olsson wrote: Very recently here on netdev "Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1" was discussed this resulted in: I see it's in 2.6.11-rc4 - I should probably just upgrade to that and see what happens :); /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00580.html (8,473 bytes)
5. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:42:26 +0100; After reading the thread and doing some research of my own it looks like that is what I'm suffering from. I will try the patch to see if it helps. Thank you for the help. Jeroen Simonetti -- Netland; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00610.html (9,027 bytes)
6. 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: "J. Simonetti" <jeroens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:40:13 +0100; Hi list, I was directed to this list for my question. I searched many archives but could not find any recent posts about this subject so I ask again. I have a linux (Fedora core 3) based router. I do; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01592.html (7,717 bytes)
7. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:44:02 -0500; J. Simonetti wrote: I have a linux (Fedora core 3) based router. I does approximately 50Mbps aggregated traffic. However once every week (approx) the router dies with 'kernel: dst cache overflow' mes; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01597.html (8,870 bytes)
8. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:28:31 +0100; Hello! Very recently here on netdev "Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1" was discussed this resulted in: and a similar patch for ipv6. Should be a start. --ro; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01598.html (9,432 bytes)
9. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:11:57 -0500; I see it's in 2.6.11-rc4 - I should probably just upgrade to that and see what happens :) David -- David J. Coulson email: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx web: http://www.davidcoulson.net/ phone: (216) 920-31; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01600.html (8,598 bytes)
10. Re: 2.6.10 dst cache overflow (score: 1): Author: "J. Simonetti" <jeroens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:42:26 +0100; After reading the thread and doing some research of my own it looks like that is what I'm suffering from. I will try the patch to see if it helps. Thank you for the help. Jeroen Simonetti -- Netland; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01630.html (9,164 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]