Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.1\-mm4\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:12:17 +0100
Net driver problem: werewolf:/etc# modprobe --verbose 3c59x insmod /lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.ko FATAL: Error inserting 3c59x (/lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.k
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00372.html (8,622 bytes)

2. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:55:35 -0800
hmm, cute. -- 25/drivers/net/3c59x.c~3c59x-modprobe-fix 2004-01-17 21:49:14.000000000 -0800 +++ 25-akpm/drivers/net/3c59x.c 2004-01-17 21:49:18.000000000 -0800 @@ -211,11 +211,11 @@ /* Set the copy b
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00374.html (8,642 bytes)

3. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:11:28 +0100
Yes. It worked. I thought of this, but why this and not the other parameters ? Compiler bug ? Witches... -- J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex: werewolf!able!es \ It's better
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00375.html (8,653 bytes)

4. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: eu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:17:08 -0800
Presumably, recent gcc's remove the variable altogether and just expand the constant inline. When the central module code checks for the parameter's existence in the module's symbol table it errors o
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00376.html (8,889 bytes)

5. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:42:19 +1100
MODULE_PARM considered harmful. Unfortunately, there's no easy way of fixing this, since MODULE_PARM() is often used on variables which aren't declared yet 8(. (I tried this in an early patch). Migra
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00387.html (8,552 bytes)

6. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:12:17 +0100
Net driver problem: werewolf:/etc# modprobe --verbose 3c59x insmod /lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.ko FATAL: Error inserting 3c59x (/lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.k
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01080.html (8,805 bytes)

7. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:55:35 -0800
hmm, cute. -- 25/drivers/net/3c59x.c~3c59x-modprobe-fix 2004-01-17 21:49:14.000000000 -0800 +++ 25-akpm/drivers/net/3c59x.c 2004-01-17 21:49:18.000000000 -0800 @@ -211,11 +211,11 @@ /* Set the copy b
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01082.html (8,779 bytes)

8. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:11:28 +0100
Yes. It worked. I thought of this, but why this and not the other parameters ? Compiler bug ? Witches... -- J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex: werewolf!able!es \ It's better
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01083.html (8,873 bytes)

9. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:17:08 -0800
Presumably, recent gcc's remove the variable altogether and just expand the constant inline. When the central module code checks for the parameter's existence in the module's symbol table it errors o
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01084.html (9,091 bytes)

10. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1)
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:42:19 +1100
MODULE_PARM considered harmful. Unfortunately, there's no easy way of fixing this, since MODULE_PARM() is often used on variables which aren't declared yet 8(. (I tried this in an early patch). Migra
/archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01095.html (8,782 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu