Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.1\-mm4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.1\-mm4\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:12:17 +0100; Net driver problem: werewolf:/etc# modprobe --verbose 3c59x insmod /lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.ko FATAL: Error inserting 3c59x (/lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.k; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00372.html (8,622 bytes)
2. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:55:35 -0800; hmm, cute. -- 25/drivers/net/3c59x.c~3c59x-modprobe-fix 2004-01-17 21:49:14.000000000 -0800 +++ 25-akpm/drivers/net/3c59x.c 2004-01-17 21:49:18.000000000 -0800 @@ -211,11 +211,11 @@ /* Set the copy b; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00374.html (8,642 bytes)
3. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:11:28 +0100; Yes. It worked. I thought of this, but why this and not the other parameters ? Compiler bug ? Witches... -- J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex: werewolf!able!es \ It's better; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00375.html (8,653 bytes)
4. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: eu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:17:08 -0800; Presumably, recent gcc's remove the variable altogether and just expand the constant inline. When the central module code checks for the parameter's existence in the module's symbol table it errors o; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00376.html (8,889 bytes)
5. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:42:19 +1100; MODULE_PARM considered harmful. Unfortunately, there's no easy way of fixing this, since MODULE_PARM() is often used on variables which aren't declared yet 8(. (I tried this in an early patch). Migra; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00387.html (8,552 bytes)
6. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:12:17 +0100; Net driver problem: werewolf:/etc# modprobe --verbose 3c59x insmod /lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.ko FATAL: Error inserting 3c59x (/lib/modules/2.6.1-jam4/kernel/drivers/net/3c59x.k; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01080.html (8,805 bytes)
7. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:55:35 -0800; hmm, cute. -- 25/drivers/net/3c59x.c~3c59x-modprobe-fix 2004-01-17 21:49:14.000000000 -0800 +++ 25-akpm/drivers/net/3c59x.c 2004-01-17 21:49:18.000000000 -0800 @@ -211,11 +211,11 @@ /* Set the copy b; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01082.html (8,779 bytes)
8. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:11:28 +0100; Yes. It worked. I thought of this, but why this and not the other parameters ? Compiler bug ? Witches... -- J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex: werewolf!able!es \ It's better; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01083.html (8,873 bytes)
9. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:17:08 -0800; Presumably, recent gcc's remove the variable altogether and just expand the constant inline. When the central module code checks for the parameter's existence in the module's symbol table it errors o; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01084.html (9,091 bytes)
10. Re: 2.6.1-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:42:19 +1100; MODULE_PARM considered harmful. Unfortunately, there's no easy way of fixing this, since MODULE_PARM() is often used on variables which aren't declared yet 8(. (I tried this in an early patch). Migra; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01095.html (8,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]