Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.3\-SGI_XFS_1\.0\.1smp\s+leaks\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:33:25 -0400
I ran the 1.0 redhatish kernel for months with no major problems other than a few data corruption bugs on dirty recovery. I was hoping that upgrading to 1.0.1 would fix those issues, but now I seem t
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00833.html (7,404 bytes)

2. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:38:06 -0500
Hmm, maybe there is an interaction with changes from redhat, is the machine actually behaving worse? The oss website has been up and running on a 1.0.1 XFS kernel for nearly 31 days now and that mac
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00838.html (8,314 bytes)

3. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 01:13:22 -1000 (HST)
Hello Gerald - The "used" memory reported by /proc/meminfo is apparently not a meaningful measurement of non-freeable memory when there are large values in /proc/slabinfo. There are some XFS and page
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00883.html (8,975 bytes)

4. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:35:50 -0400
here is a little more info from my machine.. i suspect the behavior will be more pronounced either this evening or tomorrow morning as my machine will have been up longer. The machine has been mostly
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00885.html (14,180 bytes)

5. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:53:24 -0500
There is nothing wrong with the numbers you sent, here are mine - from a very responsive box (typing on it now) kmem_cache 102 102 232 6 6 1 : 252 126 nfs_read_data 150 150 384 15 15 1 : 124 62 nfs_
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00894.html (20,952 bytes)

6. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:04:25 -0400
The last time the machine was up long enough to exhibit this behavior, it had about 100M in swap which could not manage to unswap. Summing over the SIZE of all processes gave about 150M or so (the m
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00895.html (8,855 bytes)

7. 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:33:25 -0400
I ran the 1.0 redhatish kernel for months with no major problems other than a few data corruption bugs on dirty recovery. I was hoping that upgrading to 1.0.1 would fix those issues, but now I seem t
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02124.html (7,404 bytes)

8. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:38:06 -0500
Hmm, maybe there is an interaction with changes from redhat, is the machine actually behaving worse? The oss website has been up and running on a 1.0.1 XFS kernel for nearly 31 days now and that mac
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02129.html (8,314 bytes)

9. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 01:13:22 -1000 (HST)
Hello Gerald - The "used" memory reported by /proc/meminfo is apparently not a meaningful measurement of non-freeable memory when there are large values in /proc/slabinfo. There are some XFS and page
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02174.html (8,975 bytes)

10. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:35:50 -0400
here is a little more info from my machine.. i suspect the behavior will be more pronounced either this evening or tomorrow morning as my machine will have been up longer. The machine has been mostly
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02176.html (14,180 bytes)

11. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:53:24 -0500
There is nothing wrong with the numbers you sent, here are mine - from a very responsive box (typing on it now) kmem_cache 102 102 232 6 6 1 : 252 126 nfs_read_data 150 150 384 15 15 1 : 124 62 nfs_
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02185.html (20,952 bytes)

12. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:04:25 -0400
The last time the machine was up long enough to exhibit this behavior, it had about 100M in swap which could not manage to unswap. Summing over the SIZE of all processes gave about 150M or so (the m
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02186.html (8,855 bytes)

13. 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Britton <gbritton@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:33:25 -0400
I ran the 1.0 redhatish kernel for months with no major problems other than a few data corruption bugs on dirty recovery. I was hoping that upgrading to 1.0.1 would fix those issues, but now I seem t
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03415.html (7,404 bytes)

14. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:38:06 -0500
Hmm, maybe there is an interaction with changes from redhat, is the machine actually behaving worse? The oss website has been up and running on a 1.0.1 XFS kernel for nearly 31 days now and that mac
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03420.html (8,385 bytes)

15. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: Sidik Isani <isani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 01:13:22 -1000 (HST)
Hello Gerald - The "used" memory reported by /proc/meminfo is apparently not a meaningful measurement of non-freeable memory when there are large values in /proc/slabinfo. There are some XFS and page
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03465.html (9,008 bytes)

16. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Britton <gbritton@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:35:50 -0400
here is a little more info from my machine.. i suspect the behavior will be more pronounced either this evening or tomorrow morning as my machine will have been up longer. The machine has been mostly
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03467.html (14,312 bytes)

17. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:53:24 -0500
There is nothing wrong with the numbers you sent, here are mine - from a very responsive box (typing on it now) kmem_cache 102 102 232 6 6 1 : 252 126 nfs_read_data 150 150 384 15 15 1 : 124 62 nfs_
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03476.html (21,023 bytes)

18. Re: 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1smp leaks? (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Britton <gbritton@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:04:25 -0400
The last time the machine was up long enough to exhibit this behavior, it had about 100M in swap which could not manage to unswap. Summing over the SIZE of all processes gave about 150M or so (the m
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03477.html (9,005 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu