Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.25\s+\&\s+xfs\s+\&\s+ide\s+write\s+barriers\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author: Michael Lampe <Michael.Lampe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:06:38 +0100
if (flush) set_bit(BH_Ordered_Flush, &bufferlist[cnt-1]->b_state); in _pagebuf_page_io. Is this all I need (I already have applied the ide write barrier patch) to safely use disk write back caching?
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00001.html (26,584 bytes)

2. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:05:05 -0500
Michael Lampe wrote: Is this all I need (I already have applied the ide write barrier patch) to safely use disk write back caching? (which IDE write barrier patch is that, out of curiousity?) The one
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00004.html (9,305 bytes)

3. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author: Michael Lampe <Michael.Lampe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:10:02 +0100
Jeremy Jackson wrote: SCSI disks use TCQ to achieve write performance without compromising data integrity. Ordered queue tags can be used to implement write barriers. (XFS guys - Linux does this, rig
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00006.html (8,676 bytes)

4. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:44:35 -0500
Jeremy & Michael, Actually, the answer is: "not yet". There is extant code, but the controllers and disks that can actually make use of it is rather thin right now (in the ATA camp). -- kernel, n.: A
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00051.html (8,858 bytes)

5. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:06:38 +0100
if (flush) set_bit(BH_Ordered_Flush, &bufferlist[cnt-1]->b_state); in _pagebuf_page_io. Is this all I need (I already have applied the ide write barrier patch) to safely use disk write back caching?
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00391.html (26,584 bytes)

6. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:05:05 -0500
Michael Lampe wrote: Is this all I need (I already have applied the ide write barrier patch) to safely use disk write back caching? (which IDE write barrier patch is that, out of curiousity?) The one
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00394.html (9,305 bytes)

7. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:10:02 +0100
Jeremy Jackson wrote: SCSI disks use TCQ to achieve write performance without compromising data integrity. Ordered queue tags can be used to implement write barriers. (XFS guys - Linux does this, rig
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00396.html (8,676 bytes)

8. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:44:35 -0500
Jeremy & Michael, Actually, the answer is: "not yet". There is extant code, but the controllers and disks that can actually make use of it is rather thin right now (in the ATA camp). -- kernel, n.: A
/archives/xfs/2004-03/msg00441.html (8,858 bytes)

9. 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:02:18 +0100
fs/xfs/linux/xfs_buf.c already has if (flush) set_bit(BH_Ordered_Flush, &bufferlist[cnt-1]->b_state); in _pagebuf_page_io. Is this all I need (I already have applied the ide write barrier patch) to s
/archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00298.html (7,266 bytes)

10. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:19:24 +1100
redhat.co
/archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00332.html (7,998 bytes)

11. 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:02:18 +0100
d our edi
/archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00633.html (7,266 bytes)

12. Re: 2.4.25 & xfs & ide write barriers (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:19:24 +1100
ttp://www.redhat.co
/archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00667.html (7,998 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu