Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.22\-pre\s+patches\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:56:57 -0400 (EDT)
Anyone know if/when the cvs snapshots will cleanly apply against the 2.4.22-pre1 kernel? I'd really like to use it, as the acpi support is significantly better than what was in 2.4.21(-final). -- ~~~
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00277.html (7,664 bytes)

2. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Jun 2003 16:19:08 -0500
Your best bet is to take the xfs cvs kernel, and apply the 2.4.22-pre patch to it. Apart from kdb, it is usually pretty clean. Steve
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00280.html (8,643 bytes)

3. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: rd <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:22:35 +0100
I don't think it's that easy. 2.4.22-pre has the O_DIRECT changes from sct. Fixing XFS so that it compiles isn't that difficult (just some conflicts in filemap.c) but it's much more work to not cripp
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00281.html (9,491 bytes)

4. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Jun 2003 16:30:07 -0500
Grr, forgot about that, I suppose we bounced off Marcello like water off a duck's back again - I saw you mention sending him infrastructure patches again? Steve
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00282.html (9,083 bytes)

5. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: rd <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:55:50 -0700
Your best bet is to take the xfs cvs kernel, and apply the 2.4.22-pre patch to it. Apart from kdb, it is usually pretty clean. I don't think it's that easy. 2.4.22-pre has the O_DIRECT changes from
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00283.html (10,219 bytes)

6. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:46:51 +0200 (CEST)
why not applying the acpi patch only? They have a pretty acpi-20030619-2.4.21.diff.gz on www.sf.net/projects/acpi Ciao, -m
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00285.html (9,241 bytes)

7. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: nuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:26:50 -0400 (EDT)
What do you mean by 'only'? That is the patch that i tried to apply, however i don't even think its neccesary in 2.4.22-pre1, because its already been updated with the same patches. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00289.html (10,168 bytes)

8. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 15:57:01 +0200 (CEST)
as i've understood it, if you're interested only in new acpi features of 2.4.22-pre1 (and of course in XFS), you can download the current XFS cvs kernel (2.4.21 based) and apply the latest acpi patc
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00290.html (10,246 bytes)

9. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: a <matteo@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:00:29 -0400 (EDT)
How trivial are we talking about? My C is about as good as 'hello world' -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Linux Step-b
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00291.html (10,053 bytes)

10. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:03:21 +0200
Net Llama! wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Matteo Centonza wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/25/03 14:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:19:08PM -0500, Steve Lord w
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00293.html (11,173 bytes)

11. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: rebel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:07:23 -0800
then use the xfs split patches against a mainline 2.4.21, and don't apply the kdb split patch. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpWEgebZbK09.pgp Description: PGP signatur
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00294.html (9,101 bytes)

12. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: aemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:13:50 -0700
How trivial are we talking about? My C is about as good as 'hello world' then use the xfs split patches against a mainline 2.4.21, and don't apply the kdb split patch. OK, i'm trying that and not hav
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00302.html (9,995 bytes)

13. 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: tin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:56:57 -0400 (EDT)
Anyone know if/when the cvs snapshots will cleanly apply against the 2.4.22-pre1 kernel? I'd really like to use it, as the acpi support is significantly better than what was in 2.4.21(-final). -- ~~~
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00605.html (7,664 bytes)

14. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: ristoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Jun 2003 16:19:08 -0500
Your best bet is to take the xfs cvs kernel, and apply the 2.4.22-pre patch to it. Apart from kdb, it is usually pretty clean. Steve
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00608.html (8,643 bytes)

15. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:22:35 +0100
I don't think it's that easy. 2.4.22-pre has the O_DIRECT changes from sct. Fixing XFS so that it compiles isn't that difficult (just some conflicts in filemap.c) but it's much more work to not cripp
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00609.html (9,491 bytes)

16. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: ristoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Jun 2003 16:30:07 -0500
Grr, forgot about that, I suppose we bounced off Marcello like water off a duck's back again - I saw you mention sending him infrastructure patches again? Steve
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00610.html (9,083 bytes)

17. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:55:50 -0700
Your best bet is to take the xfs cvs kernel, and apply the 2.4.22-pre patch to it. Apart from kdb, it is usually pretty clean. I don't think it's that easy. 2.4.22-pre has the O_DIRECT changes from
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00611.html (10,219 bytes)

18. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: t <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:46:51 +0200 (CEST)
why not applying the acpi patch only? They have a pretty acpi-20030619-2.4.21.diff.gz on www.sf.net/projects/acpi Ciao, -m
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00613.html (9,241 bytes)

19. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:26:50 -0400 (EDT)
What do you mean by 'only'? That is the patch that i tried to apply, however i don't even think its neccesary in 2.4.22-pre1, because its already been updated with the same patches. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00617.html (10,168 bytes)

20. Re: 2.4.22-pre patches (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 15:57:01 +0200 (CEST)
as i've understood it, if you're interested only in new acpi features of 2.4.22-pre1 (and of course in XFS), you can download the current XFS cvs kernel (2.4.21 based) and apply the latest acpi patc
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00618.html (10,246 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu