Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.20\-pre10\-aa1\:\s+unresolved\s+symbol\s+in\s+xfs\.o\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.20\-pre10\-aa1\:\s+unresolved\s+symbol\s+in\s+xfs\.o\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:25:58 +0200; (from #ifdef CONFIG_KDB down to #endif, minus the leading '+') immed; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00294.html (8,005 bytes)
2. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:19:08 +0200; fs.o depmod:; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00297.html (8,836 bytes)
3. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:41:48 +0200; l in the meantime (select Y instead of M). For some reason bleeding edge gcc from CVS generates a flood of symbol errors when I run depm; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00299.html (9,550 bytes)
4. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:16:15 +0200; l in the meantime (select Y instead of M). For some reason bleeding edge gcc from CVS generates a flood of symbol errors when I run depm; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00301.html (9,952 bytes)
5. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:12:07 +0100; ur patch). Not only the permissions bit seem to be fine now, but also the ghost-acl entries are gone. Definitely makes me happy! ;) Thank; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00304.html (14,332 bytes)
6. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:36:05 +0200; sync on its own is enough. wsync makes xfs transactions synchronous, but the sync will make file writes synchronous and that flushes the; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00309.html (8,804 bytes)
7. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:16:44 +1000; s like ACLs so the fs isn't totally irrelevant. Simo; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00324.html (7,920 bytes)
8. to ilookup (score: 1): Author: s-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:25:58 +0200; ain.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 255. Hunk #3 succee; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01073.html (8,005 bytes)
9. sdump, -e and -l 1 (score: 1): Author: myer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:19:08 +0200; se_options(), find init= and insert the kdb chunk (from #ifdef CONFIG_KDB down to #endif, minus the leading '+') immed; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01076.html (8,836 bytes)
10. bol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:41:48 +0200; m trying to compile 2.4.20-pre10aa1 with xfs enabled as module. make modules_install ends up in: depmod: ** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20-pre10aa1/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.o depmod:; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01078.html (9,550 bytes)
11. : re[2]: Work Items (score: 1): Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:16:15 +0200; is done before the 2.6.x kernels are released, what will the max. 2.6.x XFS-Linux filesystem be? Just Curious; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01080.html (9,952 bytes)
12. : root xfs filesystem executable bits bug comeback?) (score: 1): Author: myer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:12:07 +0100; link it into the kernel in the meantime (select Y instead of M). For some reason bleeding edge gcc from CVS generates a flood of symbol errors when I run depm; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01083.html (14,332 bytes)
13. ?? (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:36:05 +0200; f it.. Still required part of 00_o_direct-read-overflow-write-locking-xfs-1 below: diff -urNp 2.4.19rc1/include/linux/fs; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01088.html (8,804 bytes)
14. systems (score: 1): Author: czyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:16:44 +1000; lesystems. On one of my fs xfs_repairs ends with the following error. I'm using XFS 1.2pre kernel and utilities.. The second xfs_r; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01103.html (7,920 bytes)
15. 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:25:58 +0200; Hi Andrea, I'm trying to compile 2.4.20-pre10aa1 with xfs enabled as module. make modules_install ends up in: depmod: ** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20-pre10aa1/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.o depmod:; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01852.html (7,931 bytes)
16. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:19:08 +0200; I logged it so it will be fixed. You can link it into the kernel in the meantime (select Y instead of M). For some reason bleeding edge gcc from CVS generates a flood of symbol errors when I run depm; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01855.html (8,892 bytes)
17. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:41:48 +0200; I logged it so it will be fixed. You can link it into the kernel in the meantime (select Y instead of M). For some reason bleeding edge gcc from CVS generates a flood of symbol errors when I run depm; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01857.html (9,589 bytes)
18. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:16:15 +0200; do_generic_file_write is missing, one patch is probably missing, I will fix it in a few days, the last usable xfs was probably in 2.4.20pre5aa1. Andrea; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01859.html (10,065 bytes)
19. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:12:07 +0100; No. you removed that patch in your last release because marcelo merged a part of it.. Still required part of 00_o_direct-read-overflow-write-locking-xfs-1 below: diff -urNp 2.4.19rc1/include/linux/fs; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01862.html (14,517 bytes)
20. Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o (score: 1): Author: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:36:05 +0200; correct, thanks. Andrea; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01867.html (8,974 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]