Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.11\s+and\s+large\s+files\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.11\s+and\s+large\s+files\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:23:44 +0000 (UTC); I do not think this problem is XFS related, but as I got the kernel source from the XFS cvs, I just ask here: 2.4.11 compiles fine and runs, but when I try to create files that are larger than 2GB,; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00279.html (8,612 bytes)
2. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 14:27:55 +0200; Hello Robert, I've seen such reports about 2.4.11-pre series as well. Try looking at lkml archives - http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/ and asking there. AFAIR there was no solution provid; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00280.html (9,688 bytes)
3. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:39:25 -0500; If you are using a non-xfs filesystem for I/O then unless your application opens the file without O_LARGEFILE it will get bounced out of the kernel this way when it attempts to cross the 2G boundary; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00288.html (9,351 bytes)
4. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:47:52 +0200; I see, but this must be new, because dd works on 2.4.5 and not on 2.4.11, hm. Why do these changes occur in a "stable" kernel. Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformat; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00289.html (9,193 bytes)
5. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:54:23 +0200; I see, but this must be new, because dd works on 2.4.5 and not on 2.4.11, hm. Why do these changes occur in a "stable" kernel. Because it is actually the start of the 2.5 series perhaps, and linus fo; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00290.html (9,677 bytes)
6. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:56:54 -0500; Well, stable does not appear to have its usual meaning in the 2.4 series, this code however, appeared in 2.4.4 back in April, so has been there for a while now. I am not sure what happened with dd t; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00291.html (9,591 bytes)
7. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:25:27 -0400; Hi Robert, I compiled 2.4.10+XFS with "Quotas" turned on, and for some reason, it would no longer let me mkfs anything. (Not just XFS, but reiser and ext2 also did not work.) I always got "file limit; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00292.html (11,092 bytes)
8. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:22:37 +0200; It failed on 2.4.11, I rebootet to the still installed 2.4.5, so it must be the very same "dd" we are talking about. ;-) Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformatics R&; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00293.html (9,586 bytes)
9. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:27:20 +0000 (UTC); I see, and you sure get the error when mkfs reaches 2GB on the device when making the filesystem. And turning off quota solves that? Impressive. I do not need quota on that specific box, but having q; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00294.html (10,441 bytes)
10. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:27:24 -0500; OK, go back a step here - on XFS or other filesystem types? I am in the process of cleaning up the XFS write path here, doing this: [root@lord /xfs]# dd of=big if=/dev/zero seek=8192 bs=1024k count=; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00295.html (9,913 bytes)
11. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:34:03 +0000 (UTC); dd fails when doing a simple dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb sda and sdb being identical harddisks. There are no filesystems involved. There must be a check in the kernel when accessing anything above 2GB; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00296.html (10,009 bytes)
12. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:07:19 -0400; No, actually, it had nothing to do with any 2GB limit. Even doing mkfs on a small test partition resulted in some sort of "file size limit" error. (I don't remember the exact error message now.) It l; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00297.html (11,613 bytes)
13. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:34:19 +0000 (UTC); I just booted another 2.4.11 kernel the same as before just without quota support, and it works now. Starnge correlation, don't you think? Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00298.html (10,648 bytes)
14. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:26:31 +1100; Indeed. Can you tell me whether you have both XFS Quota support and (VFS) Quota support enabled? - they are separate options at kernel build time. Could you try switching OFF XFS quota support (but; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00317.html (11,138 bytes)
15. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 07:32:20 +0200; I had both options on and switched off the VFS quota, XFS quota then went also off. I'll try the other combination later. -- /boot/config-2.4.11-xfs-ngroups Wed Oct 10 10:58:03 2001 +++ /boot/config-; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00323.html (11,181 bytes)
16. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:01:04 +0200; schrieffer:~# cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 8 0 17921835 sda 8 1 96358 sda1 8 2 489982 sda2 8 3 1 sda3 8 5 2931831 sda5 8 6 979933 sda6 8 7 2931831 sda7 8 8 979933 sda8 8 9 1951866 sd; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00326.html (11,961 bytes)
17. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <robert.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:54:12 +0200; When switching off only XFS quotas it works! Seems to be nailed down: -- /boot/config-2.4.11-xfs-ngroups Wed Oct 10 10:58:03 2001 +++ /boot/config-2.4.11-xfs-ngroups-noxfsquota Thu Oct 11 09:34:22 20; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00327.html (10,665 bytes)
18. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:33:07 +1100; Uhrm. Well, thats very odd. Let me see if we're on the same page - you have a system with no XFS filesystems, and no filesystems of any type with any form of quota at all. And then you dd one >2Gb p; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00357.html (12,009 bytes)
19. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: "Ian C. Blenke" <ian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:34:39 -0400; Indeed. I've just experienced this problem as well. On a 2.4.10 kernel patched with the xfs 2.4.10-9/25 patch, I too experience the "File size limit exceeded" error. At first, I did have Quotas enabl; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00361.html (13,022 bytes)
20. Re: 2.4.11 and large files (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:14:32 +1100; Yes, I didn't mean to imply that XFS wasn't affected - I was just trying to reduce the set of possible sources of the problem. That makes some sense, at least (i.e. that switching off quota doesn't; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00364.html (12,665 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]