Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*$usagi\-users\s+00767$\s+Re\:\s+source\s+routing\s+honored\s+by\s+hosts\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*$usagi\-users\s+00767$\s+Re\:\s+source\s+routing\s+honored\s+by\s+hosts\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: (usagi-users 00767) Re: source routing honored by hosts? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 23:09:56 +0900; Who did say that it should be disabled by default? Consensus seems to be "hosts are expected to forward source-routed frames by default." ...or, do I misunderstand something? We need the conclusion o; /archives/netdev/2001-09/msg00046.html (9,014 bytes)
2. Re: (usagi-users 00767) Re: source routing honored by hosts? (score: 1): Author: cker@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:26:00 +0300 (EEST); I think it was quite widely accepted (at least nobody objected, thus I said "consensus") that _hosts_, at least by default, should not forward source-routed packets. "local source-routing" from IPv4; /archives/netdev/2001-09/msg00048.html (9,677 bytes)
3. Re: (usagi-users 00767) Re: source routing honored by hosts? (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 23:09:56 +0900; Who did say that it should be disabled by default? Consensus seems to be "hosts are expected to forward source-routed frames by default." ...or, do I misunderstand something? We need the conclusion o; /archives/netdev/2001-09/msg00183.html (9,158 bytes)
4. Re: (usagi-users 00767) Re: source routing honored by hosts? (score: 1): Author: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:26:00 +0300 (EEST); I think it was quite widely accepted (at least nobody objected, thus I said "consensus") that _hosts_, at least by default, should not forward source-routed packets. "local source-routing" from IPv4; /archives/netdev/2001-09/msg00185.html (9,709 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]