Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[xfstests\s+patch\]\s+113\:\s+add\s+testing\s+for\s+O_DIRECT\s+\+\s+O

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[xfstests\s+patch\]\s+113\:\s+add\s+testing\s+for\s+O_DIRECT\s+\+\s+O_SYNC\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [xfstests patch] 113: add testing for O_DIRECT + O_SYNC (score: 1): Author: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:15:46 -0500; Hi, This patch adds a couple more aio-stress runs to test 113. The first simply adds -S, to test out AIO+DIO+O_SYNC. The second adds -S and -o 2, which directs aio-stress to only perform the random w; /archives/xfs/2012-03/msg00075.html (8,032 bytes)
2. Re: [xfstests patch] 113: add testing for O_DIRECT + O_SYNC (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:15:49 -0600; Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks fine, I'll check it into xfstests-dev, thanks! -Eric; /archives/xfs/2012-03/msg00086.html (9,596 bytes)
3. Re: [xfstests patch] 113: add testing for O_DIRECT + O_SYNC (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 04:33:32 -0500; I'd rather make this a separate testcase, maybe moving the _do_test into common code. Rationale: newly added tests shouldn't make old testcases fail, as that would be rather confusing.; /archives/xfs/2012-03/msg00090.html (8,093 bytes)
4. Re: [xfstests patch] 113: add testing for O_DIRECT + O_SYNC (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:03:56 -0600; Well, phooey, I committed it already. I can do another patch to revert & add to a new test if you really want. -Eric; /archives/xfs/2012-03/msg00093.html (9,060 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]