- 41. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:50:40 +1100 (EST)
- Thanks Ken, that works nicely now. cheers. -- Nathan
- /archives/pcp/2010-01/msg00020.html (6,252 bytes)
- 42. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:57:46 +1100 (EST)
- Hi Max, As Yoda would say, "Do or Do Not - there is no 'attempted'"! Are you expecting more attempts, or are we good to go for 3.1 (which is planned for today). The cache.c change looks to be low-med
- /archives/pcp/2010-01/msg00056.html (7,597 bytes)
- 43. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:26:19 +1100
- nscott> Are you expecting more attempts, or are we good to go for 3.1 nscott> (which is planned for today). It "works for me", unless Ken finds something else it should be all I need for 3.1. nscott>
- /archives/pcp/2010-01/msg00057.html (7,728 bytes)
- 44. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:03:11 +1100
- So I've lied - found one more thing: top commit on onefetch branch in my git tree: he following changes since commit 43bc1d2b6ae2142ac9684d1980cf49698b2eafda: Max Matveev (1): Export physmem size, pa
- /archives/pcp/2010-01/msg00058.html (7,927 bytes)
- 45. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:55:03 -0400
- I've pulled this into my dev tree. I'll let Nathan take a look through my changes to Makepkgs (removing SGI pcp-pro/pcp-sgi cruft) before I merge to mainline. mh -- Martin Hicks || mort@xxxxxxxx || P
- /archives/pcp/2010-04/msg00033.html (8,099 bytes)
- 46. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:30:09 +1000 (EST)
- All merged in, thanks Max. -- Nathan
- /archives/pcp/2010-04/msg00060.html (6,893 bytes)
- 47. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:15:32 +1000
- nathans> All merged in, thanks Max. I see you've also wrapped a small change to pmie_daily which I've made yesterday - I was going to send a formal pull request but got distracted. max
- /archives/pcp/2010-04/msg00061.html (7,595 bytes)
- 48. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 08:04:09 -0500
- Looks good, Nathan. Thanks for the quick fix. mh
- /archives/pcp/2010-05/msg00056.html (8,185 bytes)
- 49. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:37:44 +1000 (EST)
- Its correct for the kernels in RHEL4 and RHEL5 ... (which are up to 2.6.18+rhel-patchfest). Looks like that cache was renamed in some kernel since then though. *nod*. Theres scope for trimming there
- /archives/pcp/2010-06/msg00098.html (8,840 bytes)
- 50. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:18:47 +1000
- OK, dropping mem.slabinfo.objects.total from the kernel/summary-linux group reduces the daily log size on my desktop (with a 15sec logging interval, so 4 times the default) to 19 Mbytes, 11 of which
- /archives/pcp/2010-06/msg00100.html (10,799 bytes)
- 51. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:40:21 +1000 (EST)
- Yeah, can definately be culled. Will look into coming up with a subset. Hmm, not so sure ... full (percentage) is not as useful as having capacity and space used - capacity can be logged infrequently
- /archives/pcp/2010-06/msg00102.html (8,813 bytes)
- 52. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:15:26 +1000
- filesys.capcity is already being logged once (in the platform/hinv group), which is effectively daily when using the cron-based log rotation scripts. After that, I think it is a a three-way nil-all t
- /archives/pcp/2010-06/msg00103.html (9,472 bytes)
- 53. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:09:16 +1000 (EST)
- Yep, good point. You choose. :) -- Nathan
- /archives/pcp/2010-06/msg00104.html (8,292 bytes)
- 54. [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:33:02 +1000
- Changes committed to git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp.git and also pushed to git://oss.sgi.com/pcp/pcp.git dev Don't ship the perl-PCP man pages in pcp-libs-devel since they're already shipped in the
- /archives/pcp/2010-07/msg00029.html (6,694 bytes)
- 55. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:46:22 +1000
- src/pmdas/linux/numa_meminfo.c | 2 +- src/pmdas/linux/pmda.c | 6 ++++-- src/pmdas/linux/proc_cpuinfo.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Fix up two off-by-one errors in mem allo
- /archives/pcp/2010-07/msg00052.html (7,932 bytes)
- 56. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: nathans@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:41:06 +1000 (EST)
- Great! Yes, thats consistent with what I was seeing on a couple of our hosts that have >1 NUMA node. Guess we should do a 3.3.3. Probably will pull in Ken's timezone tweak, but thats about it (oh, pe
- /archives/pcp/2010-07/msg00056.html (7,985 bytes)
- 57. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:26:28 +1000
- On 07/16/2010 09:41 AM, nathans@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: Guess we should do a 3.3.3. Probably will pull in Ken's timezone tweak, but thats about it (oh, perhaps you could take out that old spec file?). I wo
- /archives/pcp/2010-07/msg00057.html (8,908 bytes)
- 58. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: nathans@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:17:00 +1000 (EST)
- I'm just tagging it now... will send commit mail shortly. Thanks! pmlogconf is in (but needs more use in anger, I 'spose - I haven't got to it yet for our production stuff), yeah cron automation woul
- /archives/pcp/2010-07/msg00058.html (8,333 bytes)
- 59. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:59:13 +1000
- goodwinos> ok sounds good. DO you want to do the 3.3.3 release today goodwinos> or next week? I've got a couple of small changes which I'd like to push into the tree, especially if it's going to be a
- /archives/pcp/2010-07/msg00059.html (8,395 bytes)
- 60. Re: [pcp] pcp updates (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:02:35 +1000 (EST)
- Ship has sailed... 3.3.3 is tagged on oss already, sorry. /me shakes his head in wonder ... every time Max! ;) cheers. -- Nathan
- /archives/pcp/2010-07/msg00060.html (8,475 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu