Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\s+05\/22\]\s+cleanup\s+the\s+inode\s+reclaim\s+path\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\s+05\/22\]\s+cleanup\s+the\s+inode\s+reclaim\s+path\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:04:35 -0500; Merge xfs_iextract and xfs_idestory into xfs_ireclaim as they are never called individually. Also rewrite most comments in this area as they were serverly out of date. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwi; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00038.html (20,201 bytes)
2. Re: [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:29:50 +1100; xfs_idestroy severely * xfs_ireclaim is called to free.... Hmmm - I need to check if this is still true. We now use igrab() to get a reference on all lookups except the reclaim lookup. In the case of; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00069.html (15,035 bytes)
3. Re: [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:53:51 -0500; Thanks, updated the comments.; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00094.html (10,579 bytes)
4. [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:04:35 -0500; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00655.html (20,201 bytes)
5. Re: [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:29:50 +1100; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00686.html (15,035 bytes)
6. Re: [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:53:51 -0500; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00711.html (10,579 bytes)
7. [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:04:35 -0500; Merge xfs_iextract and xfs_idestory into xfs_ireclaim as they are never called individually. Also rewrite most comments in this area as they were serverly out of date. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwi; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01272.html (20,233 bytes)
8. Re: [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:29:50 +1100; xfs_idestroy severely * xfs_ireclaim is called to free.... Hmmm - I need to check if this is still true. We now use igrab() to get a reference on all lookups except the reclaim lookup. In the case of; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01303.html (15,131 bytes)
9. Re: [patch 05/22] cleanup the inode reclaim path (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:53:51 -0500; Thanks, updated the comments.; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01328.html (10,759 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]