Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\s+0\/4\]\s+2\.6\.5\-rc2\-mm5\s+\-\s+r8169\s+queue\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:37:59 -0500
Francois Romieu wrote: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] I am pondering taking your latest version of r8169, and moving the phy-related code from there to 8139cp.c. Then just add MODULE_ALIAS("
/archives/netdev/2004-04/msg00028.html (8,592 bytes)

2. [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: d S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:36:04 +0200
There are a few (hopefully) harmless things in the local queue that I'd appreciate to go mainline before the second round of r8169 changes. The patches are diffed against 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 and should app
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg00561.html (8,247 bytes)

3. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: cois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:40:34 +0200
Do you have any plans to convert it to use DAC? I feel a bit uncomfortable with using the IOMMU on x86-64 for gigabit ethernet because it would be very easy to overflow it at these bandwidths. DAC wo
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg00566.html (8,451 bytes)

4. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:14:41 +0200
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : It seems appealing. Do you have a specific schedule in mind ? -- Ueimor
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg00568.html (8,895 bytes)

5. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:35:13 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> : I should be able to cook up something shortly (i.e. during the week) so that it is available in -mm or in a separate tree. For anything else I'll go leveraging the 8139cp fu
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg00571.html (8,801 bytes)

6. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:37:59 -0500
I am pondering taking your latest version of r8169, and moving the phy-related code from there to 8139cp.c. Then just add MODULE_ALIAS("r8169"); and deleting r8169.c. The rationale is, 8169 is _exact
/archives/netdev/2004-04/msg00562.html (8,690 bytes)

7. [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:36:04 +0200
There are a few (hopefully) harmless things in the local queue that I'd appreciate to go mainline before the second round of r8169 changes. The patches are diffed against 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 and should app
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg01225.html (8,247 bytes)

8. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:40:34 +0200
Do you have any plans to convert it to use DAC? I feel a bit uncomfortable with using the IOMMU on x86-64 for gigabit ethernet because it would be very easy to overflow it at these bandwidths. DAC wo
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg01230.html (8,507 bytes)

9. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:14:41 +0200
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] It seems appealing. Do you have a specific schedule in mind ? -- Ueimor
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg01232.html (9,070 bytes)

10. Re: [patch 0/4] 2.6.5-rc2-mm5 - r8169 queue (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:35:13 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> : [...] I should be able to cook up something shortly (i.e. during the week) so that it is available in -mm or in a separate tree. For anything else I'll go leveraging the 813
/archives/netdev/2004-03/msg01235.html (8,935 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu