Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+forcedeth\:\s+add\s+support\s+for\s+interrupt\s+mitigation\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:13:57 +0200
The current forcedeth driver doesn't support interrupt mitigation, this can result in an incredible number of interrupts/sec for gigabit links. The attached patch adds a throughput mode that enables
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00026.html (20,296 bytes)

2. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:29:08 +0200
Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Na´ve question: what about the NAPI way ? -- Ueimo
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00027.html (8,499 bytes)

3. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:42:53 -0400
I was thinking the same thing...although it appears forcedeth already supports NAPI... What does this offer over the NAPI support? John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00028.html (9,503 bytes)

4. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:07:13 -0400
FWIW the ideal is to implement both NAPI -and- hardware interrupt Jeff
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00029.html (8,616 bytes)

5. RE: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: "Ayaz Abdulla" <AAbdulla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:10:51 -0700
Yes, thats right. I just gave Manfred the hardware interrupt mitigation patch (v46). Next, I will implement NAPI. FWIW the ideal is to implement both NAPI -and- hardware interrupt mitigation. Jeff
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00030.html (8,718 bytes)

6. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:33:14 -0400
The current forcedeth driver doesn't support interrupt mitigation, this can result in an incredible number of interrupts/sec for gigabit links. The attached patch adds a throughput mode that enables
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00034.html (11,686 bytes)

7. [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:13:57 +0200
Hi, The current forcedeth driver doesn't support interrupt mitigation, this can result in an incredible number of interrupts/sec for gigabit links. The attached patch adds a throughput mode that enab
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00084.html (20,311 bytes)

8. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:29:08 +0200
Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Na´ve question: what about the NAPI way ? -- Ueimor
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00085.html (8,543 bytes)

9. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:42:53 -0400
I was thinking the same thing...although it appears forcedeth already supports NAPI... What does this offer over the NAPI support? John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00086.html (9,585 bytes)

10. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:07:13 -0400
FWIW the ideal is to implement both NAPI -and- hardware interrupt mitigation. Jeff
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00087.html (8,654 bytes)

11. RE: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: "Ayaz Abdulla" <AAbdulla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:10:51 -0700
Yes, thats right. I just gave Manfred the hardware interrupt mitigation patch (v46). Next, I will implement NAPI. FWIW the ideal is to implement both NAPI -and- hardware interrupt mitigation. Jeff
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00088.html (8,733 bytes)

12. Re: [patch] forcedeth: add support for interrupt mitigation (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:33:14 -0400
The current forcedeth driver doesn't support interrupt mitigation, this can result in an incredible number of interrupts/sec for gigabit links. The attached patch adds a throughput mode that enables
/archives/netdev/2005-10/msg00092.html (12,028 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu