Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+add\s+iocb\s+to\s+network\s+protocols\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+add\s+iocb\s+to\s+network\s+protocols\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:35:29 -0400; xxxxxx>; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00182.html (71,078 bytes)
2. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: aki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:22:40 -0700 (PDT); ons. so; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00183.html (8,013 bytes)
3. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:40:25 -0400; s this?; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00184.html (8,999 bytes)
4. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT); networ; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00185.html (8,797 bytes)
5. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:31:23 +0100 (BST); des: PF; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00187.html (9,738 bytes)
6. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 06:27:09 -0400; socket,; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00188.html (9,234 bytes)
7. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: DA <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:15:48 +0400 (MSD); txt | 1; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00191.html (8,461 bytes)
8. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:24:48 -0400; asynch; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00192.html (8,960 bytes)
9. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:21:19 -0700 (PDT); on a f; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00199.html (8,220 bytes)
10. [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:35:29 -0400; Hello Dave, Below is a copy of the bk tree at: bk pull master.kernel.org:/home/bcrl/net-2.5 This tree adds the iocb parameter into the sendmsg and recvmsg operations within the network operations. so; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00793.html (71,093 bytes)
11. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:22:40 -0700 (PDT); +#include <net/scm.h> /* for sock_iocb */ What is this?; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00794.html (8,071 bytes)
12. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:40:25 -0400; The private area of an iocb for network operations contains a struct scm_cookie. The alternative is to allocate it via kmalloc when needed, but there isn't currently a way of identifying which networ; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00795.html (9,147 bytes)
13. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT); The private area of an iocb for network operations contains a struct scm_cookie. I know this. But the comment is wrong, when you say "for FOO" next to an include that means "I'm including this to ge; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00796.html (8,923 bytes)
14. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: Steven Whitehouse <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:31:23 +0100 (BST); Hi, [patch etc. cut] I have a few questions about the way aio interacts with the socket locking and the consequences for atomicity of requests: Given two aio requests, A and B both for the same socke; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00798.html (9,767 bytes)
15. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 06:27:09 -0400; The POSIX standard does not seem to require any ordering between requests, and some implementations take advantage of this by using threads to execute requests. That said, providing intra request ord; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00799.html (9,362 bytes)
16. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:15:48 +0400 (MSD); Hello! Kill it. It was not killed in 2.4 by plain luck, sorry, misfortune. However, I do not understand this. You need to pass forth and back SCM_RIGHTS is some way. It is quite dubious to make this; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00802.html (8,490 bytes)
17. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:24:48 -0400; Hello, You actually do get to execute synchronously in the user's context the first time the function is entered to queue the operation, so collecting the credentials on entry and storing them for fu; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00803.html (9,089 bytes)
18. Re: [patch] add iocb to network protocols (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:21:19 -0700 (PDT); Below is a copy of the bk tree at: bk pull master.kernel.org:/home/bcrl/net-2.5 Pulled, thanks. We can work out the issues Steve brought up independantly.; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00810.html (8,278 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]