Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+Re\:\s+Label\s+based\s+mounts\s+with\s+fsck\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: Roger Moore <rwmoore@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 10:28:12 -0500 (CDT)
Great - thanks very much. I did upgrade to 1.22 and the patch worked perfectly. We can now use labels to mount all our volumes which is very useful for our SCSI machines! I can let you have the patch
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00082.html (8,883 bytes)

2. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:36:12 -0500
Not for me, thanks - but others may want them. I've just heard back from Ted & these changes will now be in the next version of e2fsprogs. Thanks for reporting the problem. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00097.html (7,919 bytes)

3. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 10:28:12 -0500 (CDT)
Great - thanks very much. I did upgrade to 1.22 and the patch worked perfectly. We can now use labels to mount all our volumes which is very useful for our SCSI machines! I can let you have the patch
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01373.html (8,883 bytes)

4. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:36:12 -0500
Not for me, thanks - but others may want them. I've just heard back from Ted & these changes will now be in the next version of e2fsprogs. Thanks for reporting the problem. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01388.html (7,919 bytes)

5. [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 07:53:37 +1000
hi Roger, could you try the attached patch and let me know how it goes? I think we're getting bitten by the use of DEFAULT_FSTYPE (ext2) in the fsck_device() routine... this should fix that. the patc
/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01151.html (8,966 bytes)

6. [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 07:53:37 +1000
hi Roger, could you try the attached patch and let me know how it goes? I think we're getting bitten by the use of DEFAULT_FSTYPE (ext2) in the fsck_device() routine... this should fix that. the patc
/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02321.html (8,966 bytes)

7. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: Roger Moore <rwmoore@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 10:28:12 -0500 (CDT)
Great - thanks very much. I did upgrade to 1.22 and the patch worked perfectly. We can now use labels to mount all our volumes which is very useful for our SCSI machines! I can let you have the patch
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02664.html (8,941 bytes)

8. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1)
Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:36:12 -0500
Not for me, thanks - but others may want them. I've just heard back from Ted & these changes will now be in the next version of e2fsprogs. Thanks for reporting the problem. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02679.html (8,008 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu