Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+Re\:\s+Label\s+based\s+mounts\s+with\s+fsck\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+Re\:\s+Label\s+based\s+mounts\s+with\s+fsck\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: Roger Moore <rwmoore@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 10:28:12 -0500 (CDT); Great - thanks very much. I did upgrade to 1.22 and the patch worked perfectly. We can now use labels to mount all our volumes which is very useful for our SCSI machines! I can let you have the patch; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00082.html (8,883 bytes)
2. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:36:12 -0500; Not for me, thanks - but others may want them. I've just heard back from Ted & these changes will now be in the next version of e2fsprogs. Thanks for reporting the problem. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00097.html (7,919 bytes)
3. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 10:28:12 -0500 (CDT); Great - thanks very much. I did upgrade to 1.22 and the patch worked perfectly. We can now use labels to mount all our volumes which is very useful for our SCSI machines! I can let you have the patch; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01373.html (8,883 bytes)
4. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:36:12 -0500; Not for me, thanks - but others may want them. I've just heard back from Ted & these changes will now be in the next version of e2fsprogs. Thanks for reporting the problem. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01388.html (7,919 bytes)
5. [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 07:53:37 +1000; hi Roger, could you try the attached patch and let me know how it goes? I think we're getting bitten by the use of DEFAULT_FSTYPE (ext2) in the fsck_device() routine... this should fix that. the patc; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01151.html (8,966 bytes)
6. [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 07:53:37 +1000; hi Roger, could you try the attached patch and let me know how it goes? I think we're getting bitten by the use of DEFAULT_FSTYPE (ext2) in the fsck_device() routine... this should fix that. the patc; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02321.html (8,966 bytes)
7. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: Roger Moore <rwmoore@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 10:28:12 -0500 (CDT); Great - thanks very much. I did upgrade to 1.22 and the patch worked perfectly. We can now use labels to mount all our volumes which is very useful for our SCSI machines! I can let you have the patch; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02664.html (8,941 bytes)
8. Re: [patch] Re: Label based mounts with fsck (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:36:12 -0500; Not for me, thanks - but others may want them. I've just heard back from Ted & these changes will now be in the next version of e2fsprogs. Thanks for reporting the problem. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02679.html (8,008 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]