Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ogl\-sample\]\s+\.spec\s+file\s+syntax\s+for\s+assignments\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 13:29:28 +0100
Same question here. After my initial reports, I found some more bugs, but since I never saw any effect coming out of said reports, I didn't send further ones. From the top of my head, glXCreateConte
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-12/msg00000.html (8,315 bytes)

2. Re: [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: Sven Panne <Sven.Panne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:33:09 +0100
Perhaps we could collect the errata for the .spec files/scripts in a single place and make them publicly available. This shouldn't rival the official place in any way, it should be more like e.g. "Th
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-12/msg00001.html (8,592 bytes)

3. Re: [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: Sven Panne <Sven.Panne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:05:21 +0100
After some thoughts, I don't think that a separate "patch"/"bug" page for the .spec files is the right way to go. Although Marcelo didn't offer me much hope, enumerant specifications in the SI and th
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-12/msg00005.html (13,877 bytes)

4. Re: [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 13:29:28 +0100
Same question here. After my initial reports, I found some more bugs, but since I never saw any effect coming out of said reports, I didn't send further ones. From the top of my head, glXCreateConte
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-12/msg00006.html (8,421 bytes)

5. Re: [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: Sven Panne <Sven.Panne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:33:09 +0100
Perhaps we could collect the errata for the .spec files/scripts in a single place and make them publicly available. This shouldn't rival the official place in any way, it should be more like e.g. "Th
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-12/msg00007.html (8,690 bytes)

6. Re: [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: Sven Panne <Sven.Panne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:05:21 +0100
After some thoughts, I don't think that a separate "patch"/"bug" page for the .spec files is the right way to go. Although Marcelo didn't offer me much hope, enumerant specifications in the SI and th
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-12/msg00011.html (13,985 bytes)

7. [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: Sven Panne <Sven_Panne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:58:05 +0100
Hi, I'm currently trying to use the .spec files for automatically generating the low-level parts of an OpenGL binding for the functional language Haskell. The first problem was that there seems to be
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-11/msg00000.html (9,496 bytes)

8. [ogl-sample] .spec file syntax for assignments (score: 1)
Author: Sven Panne <Sven_Panne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:58:05 +0100
Hi, I'm currently trying to use the .spec files for automatically generating the low-level parts of an OpenGL binding for the functional language Haskell. The first problem was that there seems to be
/archives/ogl-sample/2001-11/msg00004.html (9,526 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu