Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[git\s+patches\]\s+2\.6\.x\s+net\s+driver\s+updates\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: n" <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 23:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Is this really what you meant to do? There's seven merges there, none of which have _any_ information about _what_ you merged, because you've mixed everything up in one tree, so that there's absolute
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00932.html (12,696 bytes)

2. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 02:25:51 -0400
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 24 May 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: Please pull the 'for-linus' branch from rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git Is this really what you
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00933.html (11,279 bytes)

3. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: lds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 02:34:41 -0400
Linus Torvalds wrote: I don't understand why you don't use different trees, like you did with BK. You can share the object directory with the different trees, but the You really can't beat cp .git/re
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00934.html (8,939 bytes)

4. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: zik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 23:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
No. Under BK, you had DIFFERENT TREES. What does that mean? They had DIFFERENT NAMES. Which meant that the commit message was MEANINGFUL. Yes, because _my_ pull script is meant to work with the way _
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00936.html (10,192 bytes)

5. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: vins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 23:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
So? It's the fastest, but it's also BROKEN. Exactly because the way you do things, the merge messages are meaningless. So fix your merge messages. Linus
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00937.html (8,688 bytes)

6. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 03:29:37 -0400
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 24 May 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: You are getting precisely the same thing you got under BitKeeper: pull from X, you get my tree, which was composed from $N repositories.
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00942.html (10,397 bytes)

7. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: o) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
I really think you'll eventually confuse yourself terminally, but as long as the commit messages end up being meaningful, your "mush everything together" clearly is the thing that is going to perform
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00943.html (9,787 bytes)

8. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: f Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 00:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 24 May 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: You are getting precisely the same thing you got under BitKeeper: pull from X, you get my tree, w
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00944.html (10,924 bytes)

9. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 23:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Is this really what you meant to do? There's seven merges there, none of which have _any_ information about _what_ you merged, because you've mixed everything up in one tree, so that there's absolute
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02221.html (12,800 bytes)

10. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 02:25:51 -0400
Please pull the 'for-linus' branch from rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git Is this really what you meant to do? There's seven merges there, none of which have _
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02222.html (11,378 bytes)

11. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 02:34:41 -0400
You really can't beat cp .git/refs/heads/master .git/refs/heads/new-branch as the fastest way to create a new branch off the tip. Jeff
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02223.html (8,947 bytes)

12. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 23:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
No. Under BK, you had DIFFERENT TREES. What does that mean? They had DIFFERENT NAMES. Which meant that the commit message was MEANINGFUL. Yes, because _my_ pull script is meant to work with the way _
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02225.html (10,332 bytes)

13. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 23:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
So? It's the fastest, but it's also BROKEN. Exactly because the way you do things, the merge messages are meaningless. So fix your merge messages. Linus
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02226.html (8,828 bytes)

14. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 03:29:37 -0400
You are getting precisely the same thing you got under BitKeeper: pull from X, you get my tree, which was composed from $N repositories. The tree you pull was created by my running 'bk pull' locally
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02231.html (10,656 bytes)

15. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
I really think you'll eventually confuse yourself terminally, but as long as the commit messages end up being meaningful, your "mush everything together" clearly is the thing that is going to perform
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02232.html (9,987 bytes)

16. Re: [git patches] 2.6.x net driver updates (score: 1)
Author: David Lang <david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 00:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
You are getting precisely the same thing you got under BitKeeper: pull from X, you get my tree, which was composed from $N repositories. The tree you pull was created by my running 'bk pull' locally
/archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02233.html (11,203 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu