Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+netem\s+\-\s+add\s+jitter\s+support\.\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: ndra@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:53:20 -0700
This patch adds jitter if desired to the delayed packets in the netem scheduler. I dropped the rate stuff out and reorganized so that an underlying pfifo queue is used (next plan is to make it have c
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00274.html (52,409 bytes)

2. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: rzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Jul 2004 21:14:10 -0400
Good stuff. - Is that NIST code/reference ok to put there? I have a feeling its non-free. - Could that table be computed in user space instead? This way you are not restricted to just the normal dist
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00279.html (9,018 bytes)

3. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:49:24 -0700
The Nist NET homepage states: As a U.S. government publication, so to speak, NIST Net is not copyrighted. You can do whatever you want with it, including employing its code in whole or in part in any
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00314.html (8,560 bytes)

4. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:53:14 -0700
I'm going to apply this. Stephen please send me a 2.4.x version as well. Thanks.
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00315.html (8,567 bytes)

5. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: amal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:12:39 -0700
In README.License: As a U.S. government publication, so to speak, NIST Net is not copyrighted. You can do whatever you want with it, including employing its code in whole or in part in any other pack
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00341.html (9,703 bytes)

6. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jul 2004 22:39:36 -0400
Exactly - i have a standard action which is currently programmable for randomization as well; so if you have a standard way to send from user space(tc) i will use it. Actually those tables are well d
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00356.html (9,160 bytes)

7. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Jamal, What are the reasons for creating netem instead of using NIST Net? Thanks, Weiguang ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://pers
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00357.html (7,978 bytes)

8. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
To be brutally honest, because NISTnet is mess and would never make it into the mainline kernel as it stands.
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00359.html (8,931 bytes)

9. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx
Date: 13 Jul 2004 06:42:55 -0400
Violently agree (as someone who attempted this). I am actualy not sure its even properly maintained anymore. cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00362.html (8,967 bytes)

10. [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:53:20 -0700
This patch adds jitter if desired to the delayed packets in the netem scheduler. I dropped the rate stuff out and reorganized so that an underlying pfifo queue is used (next plan is to make it have c
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01090.html (52,409 bytes)

11. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Jul 2004 21:14:10 -0400
Good stuff. - Is that NIST code/reference ok to put there? I have a feeling its non-free. - Could that table be computed in user space instead? This way you are not restricted to just the normal dist
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01095.html (9,080 bytes)

12. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:49:24 -0700
The Nist NET homepage states: As a U.S. government publication, so to speak, NIST Net is not copyrighted. You can do whatever you want with it, including employing its code in whole or in part in any
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01130.html (8,657 bytes)

13. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:53:14 -0700
I'm going to apply this. Stephen please send me a 2.4.x version as well. Thanks.
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01131.html (8,629 bytes)

14. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:12:39 -0700
In README.License: As a U.S. government publication, so to speak, NIST Net is not copyrighted. You can do whatever you want with it, including employing its code in whole or in part in any other pack
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01157.html (9,800 bytes)

15. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jul 2004 22:39:36 -0400
Exactly - i have a standard action which is currently programmable for randomization as well; so if you have a standard way to send from user space(tc) i will use it. Actually those tables are well d
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01172.html (9,286 bytes)

16. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: Weiguang Shi <wgshi2002@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Jamal, What are the reasons for creating netem instead of using NIST Net? Thanks, Weiguang ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://pers
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01173.html (8,025 bytes)

17. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: shemminger@xxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
To be brutally honest, because NISTnet is mess and would never make it into the mainline kernel as it stands.
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01175.html (9,046 bytes)

18. Re: [RFC] netem - add jitter support. (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Jul 2004 06:42:55 -0400
Violently agree (as someone who attempted this). I am actualy not sure its even properly maintained anymore. cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01178.html (9,125 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu