Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+meta\s+ematch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+meta\s+ematch\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. t Ethernet PHY support (using driver model) (score: 1): Author: e <cliffw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:41:11 +0100; list of tests requirements. cliffw; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00548.html (34,448 bytes)
2. t Ethernet PHY support (using driver model) (score: 1): Author: Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:54:29 +0100; speed and power. So far I added the; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00550.html (13,571 bytes)
3. (using driver model) (score: 1): Author: <afleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:20:47 +0100; far specific stuff, and PHY specifi; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00551.html (12,121 bytes)
4. t Ethernet PHY support (using driver model) (score: 1): Author: u <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:13:40 +0100; net/wan/dscc4.c -- linux-2.6.11-rc1; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00570.html (14,333 bytes)
5. icy router operates faster/better than V2.6 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:14:07 +0100; ed to handle the 5325 chip. Or, you; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00590.html (36,017 bytes)
6. here any plan to support BSD accept filter? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 16 Jan 2005 09:58:40 -0500; f seems to be a hack to begin with.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00658.html (11,369 bytes)
7. rt BSD accept filter? (score: 1): Author: over2004@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:09:14 +0100; ) and how you can hook up to it. You; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00659.html (11,132 bytes)
8. Re: [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2005 10:37:54 -0500; lvalue + rvalue pair? What if all i; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00660.html (11,514 bytes)
9. Re: [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:57:58 +0100; _VAR with "eth0" as payload(TCF_EM_; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00661.html (11,829 bytes)
10. Re: [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2005 11:11:11 -0500; got it right away. But now that you; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00662.html (17,737 bytes)
11. Re: [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2005 11:19:21 -0500; inst real dev or if nfmark, tcindex; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00663.html (11,699 bytes)
12. icy router operates faster/better than V2.6 (score: 1): Author: l <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:32:12 +0100; meta_get(skb, info, &meta->rvalue,; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00665.html (14,519 bytes)
13. ster/better than V2.6 (score: 1): Author: adi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:32:32 +0100; ot the solution I would like. In the; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00666.html (12,395 bytes)
14. Re: [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: " <jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:49:05 +0100; er rtnetlink users. Yes, to compare; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00667.html (11,909 bytes)
15. TCH] remove superfluous diverter printk'ing (score: 1): Author: aber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2005 12:18:56 -0500; one fix cheers, jamal Attachment: m_p_tc Description: Text document; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00670.html (16,100 bytes)
16. TCH] remove superfluous diverter printk'ing (score: 1): Author:; Date: 16 Jan 2005 12:24:12 -0500; makes sense fine know why they have; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00672.html (11,623 bytes)
17. Service Pack (score: 1): Author: di Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:47:51 +0100; ce Pack to your PC, as lately we have received a lot of complains regarding unauthorized cash withdrawals from our custom; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00682.html (11,006 bytes)
18. [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:41:11 +0100; * jamal <1105394738.1085.63.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-10 17:05 Found some cycles today and wrote the meta ematch. It tried to find a good compromise between speed and power. So far I added the; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02038.html (34,791 bytes)
19. Re: [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:54:29 +0100; Found some cycles today and wrote the meta ematch. It tried to find a good compromise between speed and power. So far I added the following matching possibilies: - random - load average (0,1,2) - de; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02040.html (13,622 bytes)
20. Re: [RFC] meta ematch (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:20:47 +0100; * Patrick McHardy <41E6C3E5.2020908@xxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-13 19:54 It is indeed problematic and they should be marked as "for debugging purposes (unreliable)" but at least nf_debug and nfctinfo are very; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02041.html (12,447 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]