Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+High\s+Performance\s+Packet\s+Classifiction\s+for\s+tc\s+framework\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Aug 2003 14:14:28 -0400
Apologies for late response. Its funny how i thought i was going to have more time in the last 2 weeks but due to bad scheduling that wasnt the case. Good goal. I think i will have to look at your c
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00068.html (18,905 bytes)

2. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:17:10 +0200
Hi Jamal You wrote: Apologies for late response. Its funny how i thought i was going to have more time in the last 2 weeks but due to bad scheduling that wasnt the case. No problemo ... I think i wil
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00097.html (23,831 bytes)

3. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: 04 Aug 2003 11:51:01 -0400
I promise i will. I dont think i will do it justice spending 5 minutes on it. I take it you have written extensive docs too ;-> Unfortunately it is more exciting to write code than documents. I almo
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00099.html (25,757 bytes)

4. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:21:56 +0200
Hi Jamal You wrote: I promise i will. I dont think i will do it justice spending 5 minutes on it. I take it you have written extensive docs too ;-> Of course ;-) Well, actually we are going to presen
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00137.html (18,368 bytes)

5. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Aug 2003 15:58:51 -0400
Hi there, Unfortunately due to economical reasons i wont be able to make it. I mentioned it to LaForge. It was very close ;-> The guy looked motivated i felt scared for a while that he will be asking
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00207.html (18,502 bytes)

6. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:05:02 -0700
If you input all the keys into the Jenkins hash, how does it perform? Has anyone even tried that and compared it to all of these fancy multi-level tree like hash things? I think Jenkins would work ve
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00209.html (11,815 bytes)

7. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: hemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Aug 2003 17:51:40 -0400
bond_main.c -- li
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00240.html (11,977 bytes)

8. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 17:01:30 -0700
is no check for 1
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00243.html (11,397 bytes)

9. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:39:58 +0200
rn rather than mo
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00291.html (24,026 bytes)

10. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Aug 2003 22:57:08 -0400
;-> cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00300.html (16,923 bytes)

11. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:40:50 -0700
ed, thanks David.
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00305.html (11,687 bytes)

12. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:56:33 +0200
es, but for which
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00324.html (13,468 bytes)

13. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: .hen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:56:20 +0200
circular debates
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00326.html (16,442 bytes)

14. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Heinz <nf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:39:15 +0200
learn... Shmulik.
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00329.html (13,645 bytes)

15. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: 12 Aug 2003 11:41:46 -0400
gths are used, th
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00330.html (14,995 bytes)

16. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: er@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:29:13 +0100
‡ι½θšι›…θ™Žι€š η½‘η»œζ‘„εƒε€΄+ι›…θ™Žι€šθ°ƒι’‘ζ”ΆιŸ³ζœΊη­‰δ½ ζ₯ζ‹Ώ
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00355.html (14,337 bytes)

17. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: ger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
ample of non-linear skb usage? Most still seem to use skb_linearize()
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00365.html (14,577 bytes)

18. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: e1rxq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:17:57 +0100
That's racy, isn't it? Shouldn't be, if done right. If the interrupt
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00367.html (11,637 bytes)

19. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: ka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
el). I see e100-napi perform much better than eepro100, which is what
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00373.html (11,078 bytes)

20. Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:21:58 +0100
refcount patches go in. diff -Nru a/include/net/netrom.h b/include/ne
/archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00388.html (11,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu