Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\[bonding\]\s+Improve\s+VLAN\s+support\s+on\s+top\s+of\s+bonding\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:55:18 +0300 (IDT)
Hi All, Currently, when using 8021q VLAN module to work on top of bonding, everything seems to work OK, but there are some issues that will not work according to our analysis. For example, any self-g
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00319.html (13,200 bytes)

2. Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding (score: 1)
Author: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:24:49 -0700
Shmulik Hen wrote: Hi All, Currently, when using 8021q VLAN module to work on top of bonding, everything seems to work OK, but there are some issues that will not work according to our analysis. For
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00323.html (15,084 bytes)

3. RE: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:49:50 -0400
My US$0.02: Bonding and bridging have some things in common, at least as far as having to deal with diverse hardware. It would be nice to have a [un]tagging interface that is useful to both drivers w
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00327.html (15,546 bytes)

4. [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding (score: 1)
Author: Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:55:18 +0300 (IDT)
Hi All, Currently, when using 8021q VLAN module to work on top of bonding, everything seems to work OK, but there are some issues that will not work according to our analysis. For example, any self-g
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01008.html (13,200 bytes)

5. Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:24:49 -0700
Currently, when using 8021q VLAN module to work on top of bonding, everything seems to work OK, but there are some issues that will not work according to our analysis. For example, any self-generated
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01012.html (14,869 bytes)

6. RE: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding (score: 1)
Author: "Eble, Dan" <DanE@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:49:50 -0400
My US$0.02: Bonding and bridging have some things in common, at least as far as having to deal with diverse hardware. It would be nice to have a [un]tagging interface that is useful to both drivers w
/archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01016.html (15,576 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu