- 21. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1)
- Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:34:42 -0700
- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Do you have any updates (recommendations) on how to proceed on this? Have you looked at my patch file? I think that we can make some pro
- /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00385.html (11,309 bytes)
- 22. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1)
- Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:07:10 +0900 (JST)
- Yes. I looked at the patch. I also learned about seqfile. Now I'm typing procfs seqfile part. I'll send you my (uncompleted) patch. I think per-cpu * per-interface. and, I believe statictics should b
- /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00386.html (10,488 bytes)
- 23. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1)
- Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:12:36 -0700
- I can help with seq_file if you need it. Yes, I'll begin on IPv6 statistics. -- ~Randy
- /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00387.html (10,820 bytes)
- 24. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
- BTW, for example, if we do if_indextoname() will return foobar. we, however, will see /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth9 instead of /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/foobar. This is not good. Is this just a bug not
- /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00400.html (9,747 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu