Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\/PATCH\]\s+ICMPv6\s+MIB\s+stats\s+per\-interface\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\/PATCH\]\s+ICMPv6\s+MIB\s+stats\s+per\-interface\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:03:47 -0700; I'm looking for feedback on this patch.... and (feedback) on future IPv6 MIB stats patches if anyone cares to go that far. This patch modifies the ICMPv6 MIB statistics to be collected per network-i; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00098.html (30,888 bytes)
2. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:29:15 +0900 (JST); We, USAGI, have similar code for linux-2.4. (Sorry, I forgot this one... :-p) We store per-interface in inet6_dev{}, because this information blongs to inet6 layer. I'd recommend that we split inform; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00099.html (10,221 bytes)
3. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: ideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:06:10 -0700 (PDT); From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:29:15 +0900 (JST) I'd recommend that we split information per interface 1) to minimize the /proc file 2) to minimize; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00100.html (9,719 bytes)
4. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:40:47 +0900 (JST); inimize; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00101.html (9,874 bytes)
5. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: HIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:35:48 -0700 (PDT); 62 0EEA; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00102.html (9,369 bytes)
6. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: ji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:50:30 -0700; oblems.; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00103.html (10,196 bytes)
7. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: " <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 02:17:28 +0900 (JST); ~Randy; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00104.html (10,645 bytes)
8. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:59:38 +0900 (JST); .2 diff; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00112.html (10,484 bytes)
9. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: <erik@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:34:42 -0700; , jamal; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00117.html (11,107 bytes)
10. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: epe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:07:10 +0900 (JST); ome pro; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00118.html (10,327 bytes)
11. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:12:36 -0700; hould b; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00119.html (10,617 bytes)
12. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:46:42 -0700 (PDT); 774&w=2; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00132.html (9,585 bytes)
13. [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:03:47 -0700; Hi, I'm looking for feedback on this patch.... and (feedback) on future IPv6 MIB stats patches if anyone cares to go that far. This patch modifies the ICMPv6 MIB statistics to be collected per networ; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00366.html (30,888 bytes)
14. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:29:15 +0900 (JST); We, USAGI, have similar code for linux-2.4. (Sorry, I forgot this one... :-p) We store per-interface in inet6_dev{}, because this information blongs to inet6 layer. I'd recommend that we split inform; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00367.html (10,301 bytes)
15. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:06:10 -0700 (PDT); From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:29:15 +0900 (JST) I'd recommend that we split information per interface 1) to minimize the /proc file 2) to minimize the; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00368.html (9,841 bytes)
16. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:40:47 +0900 (JST); Okay. I'd like to see ifIndex in that file, too. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00369.html (10,033 bytes)
17. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:35:48 -0700 (PDT); No problems.; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00370.html (9,531 bytes)
18. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:50:30 -0700; Yes, sounds good. Is this something that you plan to extract from the USAGI Linux 2.4 patches and submit for 2.5, or should I continue with my patches? Thanks, -- ~Randy; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00371.html (10,398 bytes)
19. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 02:17:28 +0900 (JST); Please let me see your patch in details. I'll do it today... (It is 2:00am... I'm sleepy... zzz...) -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00372.html (10,805 bytes)
20. Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:59:38 +0900 (JST); BTW, for example, if we do if_indextoname() will return foobar. we, however, will see /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth9 instead of /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/foobar. This is not good. Is this just a bug not; /archives/netdev/2003-04/msg00380.html (10,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]