Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[REVIEW\]\s+Refactor\s+xfs_repair\'s\s+process_dinode_int\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:51:21 +1100
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:33:29 +1100, Chandan Talukdar <chandan@xxxxxxxxx> Hi Barry, - In process_misc_ino_types(), dino->di_core.di_size is being accessed without being converted to machine format. Th
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00066.html (10,539 bytes)

2. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:03:13 -0800
I'm posting this for Chandan Talukdar because his email address has been booted from the xfs mailing list again. Michael == - In process_misc_ino_types(), dino->di_core.di_size is being accessed wit
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00067.html (86,974 bytes)

3. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:33:50 +1100
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:51:21 +1100, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:33:29 +1100, Chandan Talukdar <chandan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Barry, - In process_dinode_int(), we shoul
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00069.html (9,466 bytes)

4. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:10:58 +1100
Not that it is a big deal....but my 2 cents... Barry Naujok wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:33:29 +1100, Chandan Talukdar <chandan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Barry, - In process_misc_ino_types(), dino->di_co
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00070.html (9,813 bytes)

5. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:59:43 +1100
Exactly. As a result the kernel does not have endian types for single byte variables (ie. there's __be16, __be32, __be64 but not __be8), nor are there cpu_to_be8 or be8_to_cpu conversion functions. H
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00071.html (10,409 bytes)

6. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:32:35 +0000
Actually enabling sparse checking for endianess annotations is still on my todo list. I started this project a while ago but failed when the cgcc wrapper had some problems interacting with libtool. I
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00072.html (9,766 bytes)

7. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:51:21 +1100
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:33:29 +1100, Chandan Talukdar <chandan@xxxxxxxxx> Hi Barry, - In process_misc_ino_types(), dino->di_core.di_size is being accessed without being converted to machine format. Th
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00305.html (10,539 bytes)

8. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:03:13 -0800
I'm posting this for Chandan Talukdar because his email address has been booted from the xfs mailing list again. Michael == - In process_misc_ino_types(), dino->di_core.di_size is being accessed wit
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00306.html (86,974 bytes)

9. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:33:50 +1100
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:51:21 +1100, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:33:29 +1100, Chandan Talukdar <chandan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Barry, - In process_dinode_int(), we shoul
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00308.html (9,466 bytes)

10. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:10:58 +1100
Not that it is a big deal....but my 2 cents... Barry Naujok wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:33:29 +1100, Chandan Talukdar <chandan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Barry, - In process_misc_ino_types(), dino->di_co
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00309.html (9,813 bytes)

11. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:59:43 +1100
Exactly. As a result the kernel does not have endian types for single byte variables (ie. there's __be16, __be32, __be64 but not __be8), nor are there cpu_to_be8 or be8_to_cpu conversion functions. H
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00310.html (10,409 bytes)

12. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:32:35 +0000
Actually enabling sparse checking for endianess annotations is still on my todo list. I started this project a while ago but failed when the cgcc wrapper had some problems interacting with libtool. I
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00311.html (9,766 bytes)

13. [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:40:41 +1100
Implementing casefold-table checking in xfs_repair, I have to touch process_dinode_int. It's a horrendous function. The attached patch hopefully makes it much clearer what it does and removes a lot o
/archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00157.html (7,904 bytes)

14. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:05:26 +0000
This looks very good f4rom a quick glance over it. I can't claim I've verified that it still does the same thing, though.
/archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00201.html (8,297 bytes)

15. [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:40:41 +1100
Implementing casefold-table checking in xfs_repair, I have to touch process_dinode_int. It's a horrendous function. The attached patch hopefully makes it much clearer what it does and removes a lot o
/archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00473.html (7,904 bytes)

16. Re: [REVIEW] Refactor xfs_repair's process_dinode_int (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:05:26 +0000
This looks very good f4rom a quick glance over it. I can't claim I've verified that it still does the same thing, though.
/archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00517.html (8,297 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu