Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCHES\]\s+IPVS\s+\-\s+use\s+list_for_each_entry

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCHES\]\s+IPVS\s+\-\s+use\s+list_for_each_entry_continue\,\s+fix\s+NQ\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:02:57 +0300 (EEST); The attached patches against today's 2.6 BK tree introduce list_for_each_entry_continue and use it for some IPVS schedulers. There is also a NQ scheduler fix. Please consider for inclusion. Regards; /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg00805.html (8,757 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: e <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:56:59 -0700; Looks good, applied. Can you please CC: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx on all patch submissions, even small and obvious ones? Thanks. I assume you guys are still reviewing Rusty's skb_linearize() removal patch?; /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg00876.html (8,225 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:02:04 -0700; I'm such an idiot, please excuse my stupidity on this one :); /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg00877.html (8,112 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:22:47 +0300 (EEST); Always :) Yes, we will synchronize with Wensong to avoid double work. As for me, I like 90% of the changes and started to import them in my tree, I hope we will be back at the end of this week. Rega; /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg00880.html (8,179 bytes)
5. [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:02:57 +0300 (EEST); Hello, The attached patches against today's 2.6 BK tree introduce list_for_each_entry_continue and use it for some IPVS schedulers. There is also a NQ scheduler fix. Please consider for inclusion. Re; /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg01734.html (8,757 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:56:59 -0700; Looks good, applied. Can you please CC: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx on all patch submissions, even small and obvious ones? Thanks. I assume you guys are still reviewing Rusty's skb_linearize() removal patch?; /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg01805.html (8,319 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:02:04 -0700; I'm such an idiot, please excuse my stupidity on this one :); /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg01806.html (8,233 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCHES] IPVS - use list_for_each_entry_continue, fix NQ (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:22:47 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Always :) Yes, we will synchronize with Wensong to avoid double work. As for me, I like 90% of the changes and started to import them in my tree, I hope we will be back at the end of this week; /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg01809.html (8,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]