Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+PKT_SCHED\s+0\/17\]\:\s+tc\s+action\s+cleanup\s+\+\s+fixes\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. style in act_api.c (score: 1)
Author: etzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 04:39:11 +0100
parision style in act_api.c: if (x != NULL) instead of if (NULL != x). Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@x
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00818.html (9,491 bytes)

2. its in pedit action (score: 1)
Author: k McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Dec 2004 23:56:02 -0500
tion. It misses locking and needs to allocate new memory if nkeys increases. Also disable it for now. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-o
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00834.html (12,167 bytes)

3. tion/police helpers (score: 1)
Author: af@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:34:52 +0100
xx> -- linux-2.6.10-bk1.orig/include/net/pkt_cls.h 2004-12-27 21:35:31.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.10-bk1/include/net/pkt_cls.h 2004-12-27 22:46:36.000000000
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00872.html (12,858 bytes)

4. its in pedit action (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Dec 2004 08:30:00 -0500
same size then things should work as is and my testcases dont break. Now if you feel more gracious, go ahead and fix them ;-> Yes, this patch was silly, I sho
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00876.html (13,565 bytes)

5. ilter extension API (score: 1)
Author: af@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:16:42 +0100
xxxxxxxxxxx> 2004-12-30 08:51 Is this wrong? Current code: (u32) 2004/06/15 hadi | #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT 2004/06/15 hadi | struct tc_action *action; 2004/0
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00882.html (14,127 bytes)

6. lter debug messages (score: 1)
Author: cHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:10:19 +0100
mainline) 2.6.10 my kernel log is filled with ing_filter (debug?) messages: Dec 30 16:24:58 thunder kernel: ing_filter: fixed eth1 out eth1 Dec 30 16:24:58 thu
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00886.html (9,382 bytes)

7. v6 tunnel (TUN/TAP) (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:12:04 -0200
73 Summary: Panic when using Miredo IPv6 tunnel (TUN/TAP) Kernel Version: 2.6.10 Status: NEW Severity: high Owner: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Submitter: kernelbug
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00895.html (10,158 bytes)

8. use of tcf_exts API (score: 1)
Author: w <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Dec 2004 23:45:36 -0500
little macro magic in order? ;-> Generally rest all looking good - I need to stare some more at the route and tcindex one but dont see any show stoppers off ha
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00907.html (10,034 bytes)

9. ilter extension API (score: 1)
Author: <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:54:50 +0100
, Patrick McHardy wrote: This isn't right (its also wrong in the current code). If the CPU reorders stores and another CPU looks at dst->action at the wrong ti
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00918.html (9,738 bytes)

10. ilter extension API (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:26:05 +0100
xxx> 2004-12-31 10:52 Agreed, we do have a problem when changing a existing filter and adding a action/police. Thanks Patrick. There are many of those spread a
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00925.html (9,964 bytes)

11. in U32 classifier. (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 Dec 2004 10:00:50 -0500
rtm where the different known routing apps like zebra are given an ID and certain IDs are left blank for general use. So if you run multiple tcs they will all
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00935.html (10,002 bytes)

12. [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 04:39:11 +0100
Hi Jamal, here is what I got so far, I'll continue tommorrow. Only compile tested yet. Please review and comment. Patrick McHardy: o [PKT_SCHED]: Disable broken override bits in pedit action o [PKT_S
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01769.html (9,433 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Dec 2004 23:56:02 -0500
Patrick, Thanks for this cleanup. Questions/comments: 1)compiler or style issue? You have a few of fixes from a) if (..){ single statement here; } to: if (..) single statement here; I always add an e
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01785.html (12,215 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:34:52 +0100
Questions/comments: 1)compiler or style issue? You have a few of fixes from a) if (..){ single statement here; } to: if (..) single statement here; I always add an extra pair of brace for lazy reason
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01823.html (12,685 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Dec 2004 08:30:00 -0500
I am going to try and control my fingers ;-> They have a brain of their own. So as long as lvalue was void you dont cast? p is certainly not void. the printks are meant to help a little more (and are
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01827.html (13,669 bytes)

16. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:16:42 +0100
b)Other things which i have seen compilers whine about in the past of the form: a missing cast - a->priv = (void *) p; + a->priv = p; No need to cast a pointer to void *, except if a->priv was of so
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01833.html (14,162 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:10:19 +0100
Thinking about it, I think its better to reorganize the patches by subject. While doing this I'm going to add back the useful printks in the init paths as DPRINTKs. I'm going to post the entire reorg
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01837.html (9,471 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:12:04 -0200
Patrick, Thanks for this cleanup. Questions/comments: 1)compiler or style issue? You have a few of fixes from a) if (..){ single statement here; } to: if (..) single statement here; I always add an
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01846.html (10,077 bytes)

19. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Dec 2004 23:45:36 -0500
[I dont use bitkeeper for religious reasons (i hope i am not offending anyone)]. Ok, sounds like a good plan (gives me more time to work with the driver stuff which is getting out of control ;->): I
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01858.html (10,162 bytes)

20. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 0/17]: tc action cleanup + fixes (score: 1)
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:54:50 +0100
Ok, sounds like a good plan (gives me more time to work with the driver stuff which is getting out of control ;->): I think the patches may have goten a little messy. Maybe the order should be: you,
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01869.html (9,867 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu