Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+8\/9\]\s+Enable\s+generic\s+filesystems\s+to\s+be\s+fsck\'d\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 8/9] Enable generic filesystems to be fsck'd (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:53:32 -0500
This includes a fair bit of rearranging to avoid code duplication, but the goal is to allow 'fsck -n -t $FSTYP $device' to be run on any generic filesystem. Any FS for which this doesn't work will ne
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00253.html (14,938 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 8/9] Enable generic filesystems to be fsck'd (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:51:28 -0400
Looks generally good, some comments: - I would get rid of _check_generic_test_fs and just opencode the _check_generic_filesystem $TEST_DEV in the two callers. - why the odd calling convention of _is_
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00278.html (10,273 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH 8/9] Enable generic filesystems to be fsck'd (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:38:53 -0400
Here's a version with those changes and additionally making sure _check_test_fs continues to be a no-op for nfs and udf. Index: xfstests-dev/common.rc == -- xfstests-dev.orig/common.rc 2009-06-02 12:
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00017.html (15,378 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH 8/9] Enable generic filesystems to be fsck'd (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:10:44 -0500
Thanks :) nitpicky comments below, mostly probably nitpicking stuff that was in my original patch ;) appropriate (that was probably my typo to start with!) <device> might be clearer Maybe we should m
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00019.html (19,640 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH 8/9] Enable generic filesystems to be fsck'd (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:25:42 -0400
It's only used to be passed as an argument to _mount_or_remount_rw where we only care for the !USE_REMOUNT case. So I've left this one as-is and fixed up all other issues. Index: xfstests-dev/common.
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00022.html (15,449 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu